Nuq4 الاحدث الأسئلة

  • 0
Ali1234الباحث
في: ,
  • 0
  1. Ali1234 الباحث

    Here’s why Pakistan was unable to stop the missiles launched by India—a mix of technical, tactical, and strategic limitations. 1. Limitations of Air-Defense Against Air-to-Ground Missiles According to former Pakistan Air Force officials, while their air-defense architecture is capable of interceptin‫اقرأ المزيد

    Here’s why Pakistan was unable to stop the missiles launched by India—a mix of technical, tactical, and strategic limitations.

    1. Limitations of Air-Defense Against Air-to-Ground Missiles

    • According to former Pakistan Air Force officials, while their air-defense architecture is capable of intercepting ground‑launched cruise and ballistic missiles, it lacks systems designed specifically for air-to-ground missile threats, especially fast-moving ones (Fukatsoft).
    • These missiles, fired from aircraft, travel at hypersonic speeds (Mach 3–9)—reducing detection and response time drastically. Even global powers like the U.S., Russia, and China face challenges intercepting such fast weapons (Fukatsoft).

    2. Electronic Warfare and Radar Disruption

    • Analysis of Operation Sindoor indicates that India employed advanced electronic warfare tactics—including decoys and radar jamming—which effectively blinded Pakistan’s HQ-9 and LY-80 defense systems. This rendered them unable to detect or counter incoming missiles in time (OpIndia).

    3. Structural and Geographical Constraints

    • The shared, densely populated border—just a few meters wide in places—limits reaction time. Experts note that intercepting missiles before they enter Pakistani airspace in such proximity is practically impossible, regardless of system sophistication (Fukatsoft).
    • It would require enormous financial investment to sufficiently blanket the 2,500 km-long eastern frontier with effective air-defense coverage—and even then, interceptions wouldn’t be guaranteed (Fukatsoft).

    4. Holes in Defense Strategy and Equipment Reliability

    • During Operation Sindoor—a series of surprise strikes—No Pakistani missile was intercepted; the air-defense grid remained unresponsive even as strikes hit intended targets (Business Today, OpIndia).
    • The destruction of Pakistan’s AWACS platform further exposed surveillance gaps, undermining real-time detection and response (The Economic Times).
    • Observers also highlight system vulnerabilities in Chinese-supplied air defense hardware, questioning their combat reliability under pressure (The Economic Times, Financial Times).

    🧭 Bottom Line

    Factor Impact on Intercepting Capability
    Absence of air-to-ground intercept systems No tailored defense for missiles launched from aircraft
    Speed and altitude of missiles Extremely short reaction window due to hypersonic travel
    Electronic warfare disruption Jamming and decoys neutralized radar-based detection
    Geographic proximity Limited space for timely interception along the border
    Equipment and strategic gaps AWACS loss and Chinese system limitations accentuated vulnerability

    Pakistan’s inability to stop the strikes reflects a combination of technical limitations, strategic design gaps, and tactical surprise, rather than isolated equipment failure.

    Let me know if you’d like a deeper dive into radar systems, EW tactics, or defense upgrades underway.

     

    ‫قراءة أقل
    • 0
  • 0
Ali1234الباحث
في:
  • 0
  1. Ali1234 الباحث

    A British F-35B fighter jet has been stranded in India for over 10 days due to a hydraulic system failure. Here's a breakdown of what happened: * Emergency Landing: The F-35B, part of the UK's HMS Prince of Wales Carrier Strike Group, was conducting drills in the Arabian Sea when it encountered bad‫اقرأ المزيد

    A British F-35B fighter jet has been stranded in India for over 10 days due to a hydraulic system failure.
    Here’s a breakdown of what happened:
    * Emergency Landing: The F-35B, part of the UK’s HMS Prince of Wales Carrier Strike Group, was conducting drills in the Arabian Sea when it encountered bad weather and was unable to return to its aircraft carrier. It initially sought permission to land at Thiruvananthapuram International Airport in Kerala due to low fuel.
    * Technical Snag: After landing safely, the aircraft developed a hydraulic system issue, rendering it unable to take off again. Hydraulics are crucial for various flight control functions.
    * Failed Repair Attempts: A British team of technicians from the Carrier Strike Group inspected the aircraft but were unable to fix the glitch.
    * Specialist Team Dispatched: Due to the complexity of the issue, a larger team of specialist engineers from the UK, possibly including American technicians, is being dispatched with necessary equipment to carry out the repairs.
    * Security Concerns: The jet, which is a highly classified piece of military technology, has been parked in the open at the civilian airport, raising concerns about its security and exposure to foreign eyes. The British authorities have reportedly declined an offer from Air India to move it into a hangar, citing these concerns. Indian authorities have tasked the Central Industrial Security Force (CISF) with guarding the jet round the clock.
    * Possible Airlift: If repairs prove unsuccessful, airlifting the aircraft back to the UK is being considered as an option.
    The incident highlights the complexities of maintaining advanced military aircraft and the logistical challenges that can arise when they encounter technical issues far from their home base.

    ‫قراءة أقل
    • 0