هل نسيت كلمة المرور؟ الرجاء إدخال بريدك الإلكتروني، وسوف تصلك رسالة عليه حتى تستطيع عمل كلمة مرور جديدة.
برجاء توضيح أسباب شعورك أنك بحاجة للإبلاغ عن السؤال.
برجاء توضيح أسباب شعورك أنك بحاجة للإبلاغ عن الإجابة.
برجاء توضيح أسباب شعورك أنك بحاجة للإبلاغ عن المستخدم.
In the United States, folks are big fans of football, basketball, baseball, and soccer. These sports really get people excited and bring communities together.
In the United States, folks are big fans of football, basketball, baseball, and soccer. These sports really get people excited and bring communities together.
قراءة أقل
Pakistan's T20 series loss to Bangladesh has certainly put Faheem Ashraf's performance under scrutiny, especially in the context of the second T20I. Here's what Faheem Ashraf "did" in the context of Pakistan's series loss: Second T20I (Series Decider for Bangladesh): Batting Heroics (in vain): Thisاقرأ المزيد
Pakistan’s T20 series loss to Bangladesh has certainly put Faheem Ashraf’s performance under scrutiny, especially in the context of the second T20I.
Here’s what Faheem Ashraf “did” in the context of Pakistan’s series loss:
Second T20I (Series Decider for Bangladesh):
First T20I:
Overall Impact on the Series:
While Faheem Ashraf played a brilliant, fighting innings in the second T20I that almost pulled off an impossible win, the larger narrative is that Pakistan’s top-order batting failed consistently across both matches. In the first T20I, Pakistan was bowled out for 110, which Bangladesh chased down easily. In the second, despite Faheem’s efforts, the early collapse was too significant to overcome.
Therefore, the question “Faheem Ashraf, what did he do?” likely comes from a place of frustration over the overall team performance, even though Faheem Ashraf himself provided a glimmer of hope with his batting in the second match. His individual performance in the second game was outstanding, but it wasn’t enough to compensate for the widespread batting failures that led to Bangladesh securing their first-ever T20I series win against Pakistan.
قراءة أقلThe 88-hour conflict between India and Pakistan in May 2025, often referred to as "Operation Sindoor" by India, was a brief but intense military confrontation that brought the two nuclear-armed rivals to the brink of a full-scale war. Here's a summary of what happened: Background: The conflict was tاقرأ المزيد
The 88-hour conflict between India and Pakistan in May 2025, often referred to as “Operation Sindoor” by India, was a brief but intense military confrontation that brought the two nuclear-armed rivals to the brink of a full-scale war.
Here’s a summary of what happened:
Background: The conflict was triggered by a terrorist attack in Pahalgam, Indian-administered Jammu and Kashmir, on April 22, 2025, which killed 26 civilians. India accused Pakistan of supporting and aiding the attack, a claim Pakistan denied.
Key Events of the 88-hour conflict (May 7-10, 2025):
* May 7: India’s “Operation Sindoor” begins.
* In the early hours, India launched missile and air strikes (Operation Sindoor) targeting what it described as nine “terrorist hubs” in Pakistan and Pakistan-administered Kashmir, including Muridke and Bahawalpur. India stated that no Pakistani military or civilian facilities were targeted.
* Pakistan, however, claimed the Indian strikes targeted civilian areas, including mosques, resulting in 31 Pakistani civilian deaths.
* Immediately after the initial strikes, a major air battle ensued between Indian and Pakistani fighter jets, lasting over an hour. Both sides claimed downing adversary aircraft, and there were reports of aircraft losses on both sides due to air defense systems.
* Pakistan responded with its own mortar attacks and a blitz on Poonch, Jammu, reportedly killing 16 civilians and destroying hundreds of homes.
* There were also reports of armed skirmishes along the Line of Control (LoC) starting as early as April 24.
* May 7-9: Drone Duels and Escalation.
* Over the next two nights, Pakistan heavily utilized its drone fleet, reportedly targeting 36 locations on May 8 and 26 on May 9, from Leh to Sir Creek.
* India’s integrated air and missile defense system reportedly largely defeated several waves of Pakistani drone attacks.
* Fighting along the Line of Control in Kashmir intensified and resulted in significant casualties for both sides.
* Concerns about nuclear escalation grew, particularly on May 8-9, leading to significant diplomatic engagement, primarily by the United States.
* May 9-10: Crisis Climax.
* In the early hours of May 10, both sides accused each other of launching missile attacks on airbases. India accused Pakistan of targeting Indian air bases, including Sirsa, while Pakistan accused India of attacking several Pakistani air bases, including Nur Khan, Rafiqi, and Murid.
* India claimed its air force established supremacy by targeting airfields and other military targets across Pakistan with impunity.
* Pakistan launched “Operation Bunyan al-Marsus,” targeting several Indian military bases.
* May 10: Ceasefire.
* After four days of intense fighting and under significant pressure from the United States, India and Pakistan agreed to a ceasefire.
* Despite the agreement, explosions were reportedly heard in border towns hours later, with both sides accusing each other of violations.
Aftermath and Analysis:
* Both India and Pakistan declared victory, and there was considerable misinformation and disinformation surrounding the events.
* The conflict marked a significant escalation, crossing previous thresholds in terms of geographic reach, systems employed (including modern Chinese weapons on Pakistan’s side), and impacts.
* It highlighted the growing use of standoff weapons, drones, and advanced air defense systems in modern warfare.
* The crisis underscored the fragility of peace between the two nuclear powers and the persistent risk of escalation.
Recent reports indicate a significant escalation of tensions between Iran and Israel, with Iran launching a substantial counterattack in response to what it views as Israeli strikes on its nuclear and military sites, and the killing of top military commanders. Here's a summary of the situation: Israاقرأ المزيد
Recent reports indicate a significant escalation of tensions between Iran and Israel, with Iran launching a substantial counterattack in response to what it views as Israeli strikes on its nuclear and military sites, and the killing of top military commanders.
Here’s a summary of the situation:
Israeli Strikes on Iran:
* Israel reportedly conducted widespread airstrikes across Iran, targeting military installations, nuclear facilities, and killing several high-ranking Iranian military figures, including the Chief of Staff of the Iranian Armed Forces, the Commander of the Revolutionary Guards (IRGC), and top nuclear scientists.
* These strikes were characterized by Israel as “Operation Rising Lion” and aimed at dismantling Iran’s nuclear program and responding to perceived Iranian aggression.
* Reports indicate that the Natanz nuclear enrichment facility and a uranium conversion plant in Isfahan were among the targets.
Iran’s Counterattack:
* Following the Israeli strikes, Iran launched a major retaliatory operation, referred to by some as “Severe Punishment.”
* This counterattack involved the launch of hundreds of missiles and drones towards Israel.
* Air raid sirens sounded across Israel, including in Jerusalem and Tel Aviv, and explosions were heard.
* Iranian state media reported multiple waves of attacks, with hundreds of missiles aimed at dozens of military targets and air bases in Israel.
* Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei vowed “severe punishment” and stated that Israel would not be allowed to “escape safely from this great crime.”
Impact and Reactions:
* Initial reports from Israel indicated that many of the Iranian drones and missiles were intercepted by Israeli air defense systems. However, there were reports of explosions and some damage, with 15 people reportedly injured and a high-rise building in the greater Tel Aviv area directly hit.
* The United States has responded by shifting military resources in the Middle East, including warships capable of ballistic missile defense, in anticipation of a potential broader conflict.
* The international community is closely monitoring the situation, with calls for de-escalation and emergency meetings of the UN Security Council.
* Regional actors like Hezbollah and Houthi rebels have expressed solidarity with Iran and condemned the Israeli strikes.
This is a rapidly evolving situation, and further developments are expected.
العربية 
English
India is indeed "targeting" Turkey, or at least responding strongly to Turkey's perceived pro-Pakistan stance, particularly after incidents like the Pahalgam attack and India's "Operation Sindoor" in May 2025. This "targeting" is not a military one, but rather a diplomatic and economic pushback aimeاقرأ المزيد
India is indeed “targeting” Turkey, or at least responding strongly to Turkey’s perceived pro-Pakistan stance, particularly after incidents like the Pahalgam attack and India’s “Operation Sindoor” in May 2025. This “targeting” is not a military one, but rather a diplomatic and economic pushback aimed at signaling India’s displeasure and seeking to influence Turkey’s foreign policy.
Here’s how India is doing it:
1. Diplomatic Condemnation and Strong Messaging:
2. Economic Pressure and “Boycott Turkey” Campaigns:
3. Counter-balancing Alliances and Strategic Realignment:
India’s actions reflect a clear message that Turkey’s overt support for Pakistan on issues sensitive to India, particularly cross-border terrorism and Kashmir, will have consequences for bilateral relations, both diplomatically and economically. India is leveraging its growing economic clout and strategic partnerships to exert pressure and safeguard its national interests.
قراءة أقل