Sign In Sign In

Continue with Google
or use

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sorry, you do not have permission to ask a question, You must login to ask a question.

Continue with Google
or use

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

Nuq4

Nuq4 Logo Nuq4 Logo
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Nuq4 Shop
  • Become a Member
Ali1234
  • 0
Ali1234Researcher

Should one take a large number of animals for sacrifice or a very valuable animal? Which is better?

  • 0
Should one take a large number of animals for sacrifice or a very valuable animal? Which is better?
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Answer
Share
  • Facebook

    1 Answer

    1. Ali1234 Researcher
      2025-06-06T04:38:10-07:00Added an answer on June 6, 2025 at 4:38 am

      To determine the better option, we should consider the overall impact of each choice. If the goal is to maximize the benefits derived from the sacrifice, whether those benefits are spiritual, communal, or material (e.g., distributing meat to a larger number of people), then taking a large number ofRead more

      To determine the better option, we should consider the overall impact of each choice.
      If the goal is to maximize the benefits derived from the sacrifice, whether those benefits are spiritual, communal, or material (e.g., distributing meat to a larger number of people), then taking a large number of animals would likely lead to a greater net positive. This approach would potentially reach and benefit more individuals, fulfilling a wider range of needs or spiritual intentions.
      Conversely, sacrificing a very valuable animal might be seen as a more significant or impactful act on a symbolic level, perhaps demonstrating greater devotion or an elevated offering. However, if the primary consideration is the distribution of resources or the fulfillment of a communal need, the benefit of a single, highly valuable animal might be limited compared to the broader distribution of a larger number of less valuable animals.
      Therefore, the option that yields the greatest good for the greatest number, or produces the most widespread positive outcomes, would be the more favorable choice.

      See less
      • 0
      • Share
        Share
        • Share onFacebook
        • Share on Twitter
        • Share on LinkedIn
        • Share on WhatsApp

    You must login to add an answer.

    Continue with Google
    or use

    Forgot Password?

    Need An Account, Sign Up Here

    Sidebar

    Explore

    • Nuq4 Shop
    • Become a Member

    Footer

    Get answers to all your questions, big or small, on Nuq4.com. Our database is constantly growing, so you can always find the information you need.

    Download Android App

    © Copyright 2024, Nuq4.com

    Legal

    Terms and Conditions
    Privacy Policy
    Cookie Policy
    DMCA Policy
    Payment Rules
    Refund Policy
    Nuq4 Giveaway Terms and Conditions

    Contact

    Contact Us
    Chat on Telegram
    en_USEnglish
    arالعربية en_USEnglish
    We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.OkCookie Policy