...

Sign In Sign In

Continue with Google
or use

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sorry, you do not have permission to ask a question, You must login to ask a question.

Continue with Google
or use

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

Nuq4

Nuq4 Logo Nuq4 Logo
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Nuq4 Shop
  • Become a Member
Ali1234
  • 0
Ali1234Researcher
In: Crypto Coin

Ultra-processed foods increase lung cancer risk by 41%

  • 0
Ultra-processed foods increase lung cancer risk by 41%
  • 2 2 Answers
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Answer
Share
  • Facebook

    Related Questions

    • Eight things that can cause gas in the stomach to escape
    • What are the effects of using K&N and frozen chicken on your children?
    • Do solar panels generate more electricity in strong sunlight?
    • What dangerous disease can you avoid by eating eggs just once a week?
    • What wonders did Pakistan's 'mango' show?

    2 Answers

    1. Ali1234 Researcher
      2025-08-05T23:12:00-07:00Added an answer on August 5, 2025 at 11:12 pm

      Yes — a major recent study found that people consuming the highest amounts of ultra‑processed foods (UPFs) had a 41% higher risk of developing lung cancer compared to those consuming the least (BMJ). 🔍 Key Study Details Cohort data: More than 100,000 U.S. adults aged 55–74 from the PLCO Cancer ScreeRead more

      Yes — a major recent study found that people consuming the highest amounts of ultra‑processed foods (UPFs) had a 41% higher risk of developing lung cancer compared to those consuming the least (BMJ).


      🔍 Key Study Details

      • Cohort data: More than 100,000 U.S. adults aged 55–74 from the PLCO Cancer Screening Trial were followed for ~12 years (BMJ).
      • Dietary categories: Foods were classified using the widely used NOVA system—from unprocessed to ultra-processed. UPF sources included sodas, processed meats, packaged snacks, instant noodles, and ice cream (BMJ).
      • Lung cancer outcomes: Among ~1,706 lung cancer cases during follow‑up, high UPF consumption conferred a 37% higher risk for non‑small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and a 44% higher risk for small cell lung cancer (SCLC) (BMJ).

      ⚠️ Important Context & Limitations

      • Observational design: This was not a causal trial. It found statistical associations, not proof that UPFs cause lung cancer (The Independent).
      • Smoking confounding: Although the analysis adjusted for whether participants were current, former, or non-smokers, it did not account for smoking intensity or duration. Experts caution that residual confounding by smoking remains a major limitation (Science Media Centre).
      • Single diet snapshot: Dietary intake was assessed only at baseline, so changes over time weren’t captured. Misclassification and lifestyle factors like socioeconomic status may also influence results (BMJ, Science Media Centre).

      ✅ Broader Evidence Supporting Caution

      • A separate large analysis linked high UPF intake (>40% of calories) to a 26% higher risk of death from COPD and a 10% higher risk of death from respiratory diseases including lung cancer (PubMed).
      • Meta‑analyses show that higher UPF consumption correlates with increased risks of various cancers (e.g. colorectal, breast) and all‑cause mortality (PubMed, Wikipedia).

      🧬 Potential Mechanisms (Hypothesized)

      • Nutrient-poor, high-calorie content displaces whole foods like fruits, vegetables, and fiber.
      • Additives, preservatives, packaging by-products can introduce inflammation-promoting or endocrine-disrupting chemicals like acrolein, BPA, or phthalates.
      • Gut microbiome disruption and oxidative stress may impair immune functions and DNA repair—factors relevant to cancer risk (The Logical Indian, PMC, www.ndtv.com).

      🥦 What You Can Do

      • Limit ultra‑processed items: Reduce consumption of sodas, processed meats, fast foods, sugary snacks, packaged meals, etc.
      • Emphasize whole foods: Focus on minimally processed fruits, vegetables, whole grains, legumes, fish, and lean proteins.
      • Focus on overall lifestyle: Maintain a healthy weight, avoid smoking, stay active, and reduce environmental risk exposures.
      • Stay alert: Keep an eye out for future studies in diverse populations to confirm or refine this association.

      📊 Summary Table

      Finding Details
      Risk increase ~41% higher lung cancer risk for highest vs. lowest UPF consumers
      Study design Observational cohort—cannot confirm causation
      Adjustment limits Smoking status only crudely categorized
      Implications Suggests public health value in reducing UPF intake, pending further research

      🧠 Bottom Line

      This is a well-powered U.S. cohort study suggesting a strong association between high ultra-processed food intake and lung cancer risk—independent of basic smoking status and diet quality. However, because of potential confounding and limitations in dietary and smoking data, the finding is associative, not causal. Nonetheless, combined with other research linking UPFs to cancer and premature death, it’s prudent to limit these foods.

      Let me know if you’d like tips for identifying ultra-processed foods, ways to replace them in your diet, or details on similar findings for other cancers.

      • The Times of India
      See less
      • 0
      • Share
        Share
        • Share onFacebook
        • Share on Twitter
        • Share on LinkedIn
        • Share on WhatsApp
    2. Ali1234 Researcher
      2025-08-05T23:13:03-07:00Added an answer on August 5, 2025 at 11:13 pm

      The study followed data from nearly 101,700 American adults for 12 years.

      The study followed data from nearly 101,700 American adults for 12 years.
       
      See less
      • 0
      • Share
        Share
        • Share onFacebook
        • Share on Twitter
        • Share on LinkedIn
        • Share on WhatsApp

    You must login to add an answer.

    Continue with Google
    or use

    Forgot Password?

    Need An Account, Sign Up Here

    Sidebar

    Explore

    • Nuq4 Shop
    • Become a Member

    Footer

    Get answers to all your questions, big or small, on Nuq4.com. Our database is constantly growing, so you can always find the information you need.

    Download Android App

    © Copyright 2024, Nuq4.com

    Legal

    Terms and Conditions
    Privacy Policy
    Cookie Policy
    DMCA Policy
    Payment Rules
    Refund Policy
    Nuq4 Giveaway Terms and Conditions

    Contact

    Contact Us
    Chat on Telegram
    en_USEnglish
    arالعربية en_USEnglish
    We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.OkCookie Policy
    Seraphinite AcceleratorOptimized by Seraphinite Accelerator
    Turns on site high speed to be attractive for people and search engines.