Here’s the connection between Malik Riaz and the £190 million case involving Imran Khan—commonly referred to as the Al‑Qadir Trust case: 1. What is the £190 million case about? The United Kingdom’s National Crime Agency (NCA) had seized £190 million from Malik Riaz on suspicion of money laundering.Read more
Here’s the connection between Malik Riaz and the £190 million case involving Imran Khan—commonly referred to as the Al‑Qadir Trust case:
1. What is the £190 million case about?
- The United Kingdom’s National Crime Agency (NCA) had seized £190 million from Malik Riaz on suspicion of money laundering. As part of a civil settlement in late 2019, Riaz agreed to return these assets to Pakistan.
- Instead of going directly into Pakistan’s national treasury, the funds were channeled into a Supreme Court account—purportedly to settle a massive fine (roughly Rs 450 billion) imposed on Bahria Town by Pakistan’s Supreme Court.
2. How is Malik Riaz connected to Imran Khan in this case?
- The settlement and fund transfer occurred under the PTI administration while Imran Khan was Prime Minister. NAB accuses him of facilitating the transaction, benefiting Malik Riaz, and bypassing the national treasury. In return, Riaz allegedly donated land (around 458 kanals) to the Al‑Qadir Trust, headed by Imran and his wife, for establishing a university in Jhelum.
- The accountability reference filed by NAB names Malik Riaz, his son Ahmed Ali Riaz, Imran, Bushra Bibi, Mirza Shahzad Akbar, Zulfi Bukhari, and others as suspects, with some declared proclaimed offenders.
3. Why is Imran Khan saying “I will not be a sworn witness”?
- According to a statement reported by FT, Malik Riaz, who currently resides in the UAE, said: “No matter how much you oppress me, Malik Riaz will not testify!” This suggests he is resisting pressure to testify in the case against Imran Khan.
Summary Table
| Stakeholder | Allegations/Role in the Case |
|---|---|
| Malik Riaz | Returned £190 million settlement; allegedly donated land to Al‑Qadir Trust. Refuses to testify. |
| Imran Khan | Accused of abusing authority to benefit Riaz and facilitate the settlement in a way that bypassed the treasury. |
| Al‑Qadir Trust | Beneficiary of land from Riaz; central to the quid-pro-quo allegations. |
In short: Malik Riaz’s civil settlement with the UK forms the financial core of the case. Imran Khan is accused of enabling the diversion of these funds in exchange for land, and Riaz’s refusal to testify—or become a witness—complicates the prosecution’s case and adds layers of political and legal intrigue.
See less


The closure of Microsoft's office in Pakistan after 25 years was part of a larger corporate restructuring strategy that the company has been implementing globally. While specific details about why the office in Pakistan was shut down are not fully disclosed, here are a few possible reasons that mayRead more
The closure of Microsoft’s office in Pakistan after 25 years was part of a larger corporate restructuring strategy that the company has been implementing globally. While specific details about why the office in Pakistan was shut down are not fully disclosed, here are a few possible reasons that may align with broader trends in corporate decisions:
1. Cost-Cutting Measures
Microsoft, like many global companies, periodically evaluates its operations to streamline costs and improve efficiency. If the company felt that maintaining an office in Pakistan was no longer as cost-effective as it once was, they may have decided to consolidate operations elsewhere.
2. Shift to Remote Work and Cloud Solutions
With the rise of remote work and cloud-based services, Microsoft has shifted many of its operations to be more digitally integrated, reducing the need for physical office spaces in certain regions. This trend could be a factor, especially as the company increasingly focuses on cloud computing and software services, which can be managed remotely.
3. Business Restructuring and Prioritization
Microsoft may be prioritizing other markets that offer more growth potential. They might have decided to focus on countries or regions that offer better strategic alignment with their future goals, such as emerging technology hubs or places where they see more long-term potential.
4. Changing Market Dynamics in Pakistan
The economic, political, and regulatory landscape in Pakistan could have influenced Microsoft’s decision. Factors such as inflation, government policies, or changes in the tech ecosystem may have impacted Microsoft’s ability to operate efficiently in the region.
5. Global Economic Conditions
The tech industry, in general, has seen significant layoffs and downsizing in recent years, driven by the post-pandemic economic slowdown, inflation, and other global challenges. Microsoft itself has undergone some workforce reductions and restructuring, which may have led to downsizing operations in certain regions, including Pakistan.
It’s also worth noting that Pakistan’s tech market is growing and Microsoft may continue to serve customers in the region through its global cloud and software services rather than maintaining a direct physical presence.
Do you have any particular thoughts on how this might impact the tech landscape in Pakistan?
See less