Sign In Sign In

Continue with Google
or use

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sorry, you do not have permission to ask a question, You must login to ask a question.

Continue with Google
or use

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

Nuq4

Nuq4 Logo Nuq4 Logo
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Nuq4 Shop
  • Become a Member
  • Recent Questions
  • Most Answered
  • No Answers
  • Most Visited
  • Most Voted

Nuq4 Latest Questions

  • 0
Ali1234Researcher
In: Israel, Jordan

Jordan claims to have shot down several Iranian drones fired at Israel, but why did the Muslim country of Jordan do so?

  • 0
  1. Ali1234 Researcher
    Added an answer on June 13, 2025 at 4:54 am

    Jordan's decision to shoot down Iranian drones heading towards Israel, despite being a Muslim-majority country, stems from several key factors: * Protection of its own airspace and sovereignty: The most immediate and publicly stated reason by Jordan is to protect its own territory and citizens. JordRead more

    Jordan’s decision to shoot down Iranian drones heading towards Israel, despite being a Muslim-majority country, stems from several key factors:
    * Protection of its own airspace and sovereignty: The most immediate and publicly stated reason by Jordan is to protect its own territory and citizens. Jordanian officials have repeatedly emphasized that any drones or missiles entering their airspace, regardless of their origin or intended target, will be intercepted if they pose a threat to Jordanian security or are likely to fall within Jordanian territory, including populated areas. They want to avoid their country becoming a “battleground” for regional conflicts.
    * Strategic interests and stability: Jordan has a delicate geopolitical position, bordering both Israel and other volatile countries like Syria and Iraq. An escalation of conflict between Iran and Israel directly threatens Jordan’s stability and security. By intercepting the drones, Jordan aims to prevent its own involvement in a wider regional war and protect its national interests, including economic stability (e.g., tourism) and avoiding potential collateral damage.
    * Security alliance with the United States and Israel: Jordan is a major security ally of the United States and has a peace treaty with Israel. While Jordan has been critical of Israeli actions in Gaza, it relies on these relationships for military aid, economic support, and water resources. Taking action to defend against threats transiting its airspace aligns with its broader security cooperation.
    * Long-standing suspicions of Iran: Jordan has expressed concerns about Iran’s expanding influence in the region for a long time. King Abdullah II has previously warned of a “Shia Crescent” and seen Iranian actions as a threat to regional stability. Intercepting Iranian projectiles also serves to demonstrate Jordan’s capacity to defend its borders and airspace against potential future threats from Iran.
    While Jordan’s actions have drawn some criticism from those who view it as assisting Israel and betraying the Palestinian cause, the Jordanian government maintains that its primary motivation is self-defense and the protection of its national security.

    See less
    • 0
    • Share
      Share
      • Share onFacebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
  • 1 Answer
Answer
  • 0
Ali1234Researcher
In: Iran, Israel

Israel-Iran tensions: What happened in the last two hours?

  • 0
  1. Ali1234 Researcher
    Added an answer on June 14, 2025 at 7:13 pm

    Given the current time (Friday, June 13, 2025, 5:13:11 AM +03), the provided search results are from yesterday, Saturday, June 14, 2025. Therefore, the information is not directly "in the last two hours" from the current timestamp. However, I can summarize the events from the most recent reports avaRead more

    Given the current time (Friday, June 13, 2025, 5:13:11 AM +03), the provided search results are from yesterday, Saturday, June 14, 2025. Therefore, the information is not directly “in the last two hours” from the current timestamp. However, I can summarize the events from the most recent reports available, which generally cover developments up to late yesterday (Saturday).
    Here’s a summary of the situation based on the provided results, covering the most recent publicly available information:
    * Continued Escalation: Both Israel and Iran have continued to exchange missile and air strikes, marking a significant escalation in their conflict.
    * Iranian Missile Barrages: Iran launched new waves of missiles at Israel on Saturday night, local time, with explosions reported over parts of Israel, including Tel Aviv. Iranian state television announced these latest barrages, claiming to target fighter jet fuel production facilities and energy supply centers.
    * Israeli Strikes on Iran: Israel continued its “blistering attacks” on Iranian targets. These reportedly included Iran’s Defense Ministry headquarters in Tehran, sites associated with Iran’s nuclear program (such as the main nuclear enrichment facility in Natanz and a nuclear site in Isfahan), and civilian and energy infrastructure, including an oil facility in Tehran.
    * Casualties: Both sides have reported casualties. Iran’s state media reported at least 80 people killed and over 320 injured in Israeli strikes, including 20 children and nine nuclear scientists. In Israel, at least three people were killed and dozens wounded by Iranian missiles, with reports of homes destroyed in areas like Tel Aviv and Rishon Lezion.
    * International Reactions: World leaders, including US President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin, have expressed concern and urged de-escalation. Some international diplomatic efforts, such as previously scheduled US-Iran nuclear talks, have been cancelled.
    * Threats and Warnings: Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz warned that “Tehran will burn” if Iranian retaliatory strikes continue. Iran, in turn, reportedly warned the UK, US, and France that their regional bases would be targeted if they assisted in defending Israel.
    * Focus on Nuclear Program: Israel’s strikes have heavily targeted Iran’s nuclear facilities, aiming to prevent uranium enrichment beyond civilian use and hinder Iran’s nuclear weapons project.
    It is crucial to remember that this information is based on reports from yesterday, June 14, 2025, and the situation is highly fluid. For the very latest updates in the last two hours from the current time, one would need real-time news feeds.

    See less
    • 0
    • Share
      Share
      • Share onFacebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
  • 1 Answer
Answer
  • 0
Ali1234Researcher
In: Iran, Israel

Third day of Iran-Israel tensions, what do we know about it so far?

  • 0
  1. Ali1234 Researcher
    Added an answer on June 15, 2025 at 6:38 am

    As of Sunday, June 15, 2025, the tensions between Iran and Israel have escalated significantly, marking the third day of overt conflict. Here's a summary of what we know: Initiation of Conflict: * Friday, June 13, 2025: Israel launched major airstrikes on Iran, codenamed "Operation Rising Lion." TheRead more

    As of Sunday, June 15, 2025, the tensions between Iran and Israel have escalated significantly, marking the third day of overt conflict. Here’s a summary of what we know:
    Initiation of Conflict:
    * Friday, June 13, 2025: Israel launched major airstrikes on Iran, codenamed “Operation Rising Lion.” These attacks targeted Iran’s nuclear facilities, military installations, and reportedly killed several top Iranian military leaders and nuclear scientists, including IRGC commander Hossein Salami and Major General Mohammad Bagheri. Explosions were reported in Tehran and near nuclear sites like Natanz and Esfahan. Israel stated its aim was to “degrade, destroy, and remove the threat” of Iran’s nuclear weapons program.
    * Friday, June 13, 2025 (Evening): Iran quickly retaliated with a large-scale attack on Israel, launching over 150 ballistic missiles and more than 100 drones, codenamed “Operation True Promise III.”
    Escalation and Continued Strikes:
    * Saturday, June 14, 2025: Both sides continued their strikes. Israel expanded its targets to include Iran’s energy industry, while Iranian missile and drone attacks on Israel continued, reportedly hitting cities like Haifa and Tel Aviv.
    * Sunday, June 15, 2025: The exchange of strikes has continued for a third day. Israel has unleashed further airstrikes across Iran, threatening greater force. Some Iranian missiles have reportedly evaded Israeli air defenses and struck buildings in central Israel. Iran’s Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) claimed to have targeted Israel’s fuel infrastructure in response to Israeli strikes on its oil facilities.
    Casualties and Damages:
    * Iran: Iranian media has reported significant casualties, with unofficial tolls on Saturday stating 78 people killed and 329 injured in Tehran alone. Al Jazeera reports at least 80 people killed and 800 wounded across Iran over the past two days, including 20 children and nine nuclear scientists. Israeli strikes have caused fires at oil storage facilities in Tehran and other areas.
    * Israel: Iran’s retaliatory strikes have also caused casualties. Israel’s Magen David Adom rescue service reported at least 10 people killed overnight and into Sunday, bringing Israel’s total death toll to 13. Reports indicate strikes hitting residential areas, with one attack in Bat Yam (a Tel Aviv suburb) killing at least six people, including two children, and wounding 180.
    International Reaction:
    * The United Nations Security Council held a meeting on Friday, June 13, to discuss the rising tensions.
    * Calls for de-escalation are mounting from world leaders.
    * The conflict has closed Israel’s main international airport and airspace for a third day.
    Context and Broader Implications:
    * This direct military confrontation marks a significant escalation in the long-standing “shadow war” between Israel and Iran, which previously involved proxy conflicts, cyberattacks, and targeted assassinations.
    * The immediate catalyst was Israel’s initial strikes, which it justified by claiming Iran was close to developing a nuclear weapon, a day after the UN nuclear watchdog declared Iran wasn’t complying with nonproliferation agreements. Iran responded by stating it would create a new uranium enrichment facility.
    * Experts are concerned about the potential for this conflict to escalate into a wider regional war, with implications for global energy markets.
    * There are reports of discussions regarding regime change as a potential Israeli goal.

    See less
    • 0
    • Share
      Share
      • Share onFacebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
  • 1 Answer
Answer
  • 0
Ali1234Researcher
In: Countries, Cryptocurrency Wallet, Iran, Israel, War

How is Iran regaining the trust of Arab countries after the war with Israel?

  • 0
  • 0 Answers
Answer
  • 0
Ali1234Researcher
In: Iran, Israel

BREAKING: Iran launches retaliatory missile strikes against Israel

  • 0
  • 0 Answers
Answer
  • 0
Ali1234Researcher
In: Iran, Israel

Israel-Iran tensions: What can we conclude from the telephone conversation between Trump and Putin?

  • 0
  1. Ali1234 Researcher
    Added an answer on June 14, 2025 at 1:20 pm

    From the recent telephone conversation between Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin regarding Israel-Iran tensions, we can conclude several key points: * Shared Concern for De-escalation: Both leaders expressed significant concern over the escalating conflict between Israel and Iran and a mutual desire fRead more

    From the recent telephone conversation between Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin regarding Israel-Iran tensions, we can conclude several key points:
    * Shared Concern for De-escalation: Both leaders expressed significant concern over the escalating conflict between Israel and Iran and a mutual desire for the “war” to end. Trump explicitly stated on Truth Social that “He [Putin] feels, as I do, this war in Israel-Iran should end.”
    * Putin’s Condemnation of Israeli Actions: The Kremlin stated that Putin “condemned the Israeli’s military operation against Iran” and expressed “serious concern about a possible escalation of the conflict, which would have unpredictable consequences for the entire situation in the Middle East.”
    * Trump’s Acknowledgment of Israeli Strikes: While expressing concern about the situation, Trump, according to Russian foreign policy aide Yuri Ushakov, acknowledged the “effectiveness” of Israel’s strikes on targets in Iran.
    * Potential for Resumed Nuclear Negotiations: Both leaders reportedly did not rule out a possible return to negotiations on Iran’s nuclear program. Ushakov also mentioned that U.S. negotiators were ready to engage in further talks with Iranian representatives, potentially with Oman as a mediator.
    * Russia’s Offer of Mediation: Russia reiterated its readiness to provide mediation services to prevent further escalation between Israel and Iran.
    * Focus on Middle East over Ukraine (for this call): While the Ukraine war was briefly mentioned, Trump indicated that the primary focus of this hour-long call was the Israel-Iran conflict, with discussions on Ukraine to be addressed “next week.”
    * Personal Rapport: Both leaders expressed satisfaction with their personal relationship, suggesting it facilitates their ability to discuss complex international issues.
    In essence, the call highlights a shared diplomatic objective of preventing a wider regional conflagration in the Middle East, albeit with differing perspectives on the immediate causes and responsibilities, particularly concerning Israel’s actions. It also suggests an openness to a diplomatic path, specifically regarding Iran’s nuclear program.

    See less
    • 0
    • Share
      Share
      • Share onFacebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
  • 1 Answer
Answer
  • 0
Ali1234Researcher
In: Israel

How are Iranian missiles hitting targets in Israel so easily?

  • 0
  • 0 Answers
Answer
  • 0
Ali1234Researcher
In: Israel

Will Britain also openly help Israel?

  • 0
  • 0 Answers
Answer
  • 0
Ali1234Researcher
In: Israel

Why did Israel choose Natanz for the attack?

  • 0
  1. Ali1234 Researcher
    Added an answer on June 13, 2025 at 6:34 am

    Israel's decision to target the Natanz nuclear facility is based on its critical role in Iran's uranium enrichment program. Here's why Natanz is such a significant target: * Main Enrichment Site: Natanz is Iran's primary and largest uranium enrichment facility. It houses thousands of centrifuges useRead more

    Israel’s decision to target the Natanz nuclear facility is based on its critical role in Iran’s uranium enrichment program. Here’s why Natanz is such a significant target:
    * Main Enrichment Site: Natanz is Iran’s primary and largest uranium enrichment facility. It houses thousands of centrifuges used to enrich uranium, which can be used for nuclear power or, if further enriched, for nuclear weapons.
    * Heart of the Nuclear Program: Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu stated that the strike aimed at “the heart of Iran’s nuclear enrichment program” and “nuclear weaponization program.” Any disruption at Natanz directly impacts Iran’s enrichment capabilities and serves as a powerful message.
    * Production of Enriched Uranium: Natanz is where Iran has produced the vast majority of its nuclear fuel, including uranium enriched to various levels. While Iran claims its program is for peaceful purposes, the ability to enrich uranium to higher, weaponizable levels makes Natanz a key concern for Israel and the international community.
    * Symbolic Importance: Beyond its technological capacity, Natanz holds symbolic status as a central pillar of Iran’s nuclear strategy. Hitting this fortified site sends a strong message and acts as a lever in the ongoing standoff over nuclear proliferation.
    * Prior Targets: Natanz has been the target of multiple cyberattacks and suspected Israeli-led sabotage operations in the past, including the Stuxnet virus, indicating its persistent importance as a target for those seeking to slow Iran’s nuclear progress.
    * Underground Protection: While parts of Natanz are underground and protected by reinforced concrete, making them resistant to conventional airstrikes, the recent attacks reportedly targeted and damaged underground sections, including centrifuge halls and supporting infrastructure. This suggests a significant effort to cripple the facility’s operations.
    In essence, by targeting Natanz, Israel aims to severely impact Iran’s ability to enrich uranium, which is seen as a crucial step towards developing nuclear weapons, and to convey a strong deterrent message.

    See less
    • 0
    • Share
      Share
      • Share onFacebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
  • 1 Answer
Answer
  • 0
Ali1234Researcher
In: Iran, Israel

How dangerous is Iran's dancing missile 'Sajil 2' that wreaked havoc in Israel?

  • 0
  1. Ali1234 Researcher
    Added an answer on June 19, 2025 at 6:16 am

    The Iran's Sajil 2 missile, also known as Sejjil 2, is considered a significant threat due to several factors: * Advanced Capabilities: The Sajil 2 is a two-stage, solid-fueled ballistic missile. This is a significant advancement over older liquid-fueled missiles like the Shahab-3, as solid-fuel misRead more

    The Iran’s Sajil 2 missile, also known as Sejjil 2, is considered a significant threat due to several factors:
    * Advanced Capabilities: The Sajil 2 is a two-stage, solid-fueled ballistic missile. This is a significant advancement over older liquid-fueled missiles like the Shahab-3, as solid-fuel missiles can be launched much more quickly with less preparation time, making them harder to detect and intercept before launch.
    * Range: It has an estimated range of 2,000 to 2,500 kilometers, which allows it to reach all parts of Israel and beyond.
    * Maneuverability and Speed: Reports suggest the Sajil 2 is highly maneuverable and capable of performing evasive maneuvers, including sharp angle strafes and dodges. It can reach very high speeds (Mach 11 to Mach 13 when re-entering the atmosphere, hitting the target at Mach 5), making it challenging for existing missile defense systems like Israel’s Iron Dome and Arrow systems to intercept. The term “dancing missile” likely refers to these reported evasive maneuvers, making it harder for air defenses to lock on.
    * Accuracy: The Sajil 2 is equipped with an advanced guidance package, improving its accuracy significantly. Some reports claim its accuracy can be within 10 meters, though others suggest below 50 meters. Such precision increases its destructive potential against specific targets.
    * Combat Use: Recent reports (June 2025) indicate that Iran has, for the first time, used the Sajil missile in combat conditions against Israel as part of “Operation True Promise 3,” claiming to have hit military targets, including Mossad offices, air force bases, and intelligence centers. While independent verification of the full extent of the damage is ongoing, the claims highlight its operational deployment.
    Why it “wreaked havoc” (as per the user’s phrasing):
    The phrasing “wreaked havoc” might refer to recent claims by Iranian sources and some media reports about the missile’s effectiveness in penetrating Israeli defenses and causing damage. While Israel’s sophisticated air defense systems, such as Iron Dome and Arrow, are designed to intercept such threats, the Sajil’s speed, maneuverability, and solid-fuel nature present a significant challenge. The use of “dancing” in the description implies that its flight path might be erratic or designed to evade interception, potentially contributing to its ability to “shatter” defenses as some sources suggest.
    In summary, the Sajil 2 is considered a dangerous weapon due to its rapid launch capability, long range, high speed, maneuverability, and improved accuracy. Its recent alleged combat deployment against Israel underscores its threat in the ongoing regional tensions.

    See less
    • 0
    • Share
      Share
      • Share onFacebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
  • 1 Answer
Answer

Sidebar

Explore

  • Nuq4 Shop
  • Become a Member

Footer

Get answers to all your questions, big or small, on Nuq4.com. Our database is constantly growing, so you can always find the information you need.

Download Android App

© Copyright 2024, Nuq4.com

Legal

Terms and Conditions
Privacy Policy
Cookie Policy
DMCA Policy
Payment Rules
Refund Policy
Nuq4 Giveaway Terms and Conditions

Contact

Contact Us
Chat on Telegram
en_USEnglish
arالعربية en_USEnglish
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.OkCookie Policy