From the recent telephone conversation between Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin regarding Israel-Iran tensions, we can conclude several key points:
* Shared Concern for De-escalation: Both leaders expressed significant concern over the escalating conflict between Israel and Iran and a mutual desire for the “war” to end. Trump explicitly stated on Truth Social that “He [Putin] feels, as I do, this war in Israel-Iran should end.”
* Putin’s Condemnation of Israeli Actions: The Kremlin stated that Putin “condemned the Israeli’s military operation against Iran” and expressed “serious concern about a possible escalation of the conflict, which would have unpredictable consequences for the entire situation in the Middle East.”
* Trump’s Acknowledgment of Israeli Strikes: While expressing concern about the situation, Trump, according to Russian foreign policy aide Yuri Ushakov, acknowledged the “effectiveness” of Israel’s strikes on targets in Iran.
* Potential for Resumed Nuclear Negotiations: Both leaders reportedly did not rule out a possible return to negotiations on Iran’s nuclear program. Ushakov also mentioned that U.S. negotiators were ready to engage in further talks with Iranian representatives, potentially with Oman as a mediator.
* Russia’s Offer of Mediation: Russia reiterated its readiness to provide mediation services to prevent further escalation between Israel and Iran.
* Focus on Middle East over Ukraine (for this call): While the Ukraine war was briefly mentioned, Trump indicated that the primary focus of this hour-long call was the Israel-Iran conflict, with discussions on Ukraine to be addressed “next week.”
* Personal Rapport: Both leaders expressed satisfaction with their personal relationship, suggesting it facilitates their ability to discuss complex international issues.
In essence, the call highlights a shared diplomatic objective of preventing a wider regional conflagration in the Middle East, albeit with differing perspectives on the immediate causes and responsibilities, particularly concerning Israel’s actions. It also suggests an openness to a diplomatic path, specifically regarding Iran’s nuclear program.

The Iran’s Sajil 2 missile, also known as Sejjil 2, is considered a significant threat due to several factors:
* Advanced Capabilities: The Sajil 2 is a two-stage, solid-fueled ballistic missile. This is a significant advancement over older liquid-fueled missiles like the Shahab-3, as solid-fuel missiles can be launched much more quickly with less preparation time, making them harder to detect and intercept before launch.
* Range: It has an estimated range of 2,000 to 2,500 kilometers, which allows it to reach all parts of Israel and beyond.
* Maneuverability and Speed: Reports suggest the Sajil 2 is highly maneuverable and capable of performing evasive maneuvers, including sharp angle strafes and dodges. It can reach very high speeds (Mach 11 to Mach 13 when re-entering the atmosphere, hitting the target at Mach 5), making it challenging for existing missile defense systems like Israel’s Iron Dome and Arrow systems to intercept. The term “dancing missile” likely refers to these reported evasive maneuvers, making it harder for air defenses to lock on.
* Accuracy: The Sajil 2 is equipped with an advanced guidance package, improving its accuracy significantly. Some reports claim its accuracy can be within 10 meters, though others suggest below 50 meters. Such precision increases its destructive potential against specific targets.
* Combat Use: Recent reports (June 2025) indicate that Iran has, for the first time, used the Sajil missile in combat conditions against Israel as part of “Operation True Promise 3,” claiming to have hit military targets, including Mossad offices, air force bases, and intelligence centers. While independent verification of the full extent of the damage is ongoing, the claims highlight its operational deployment.
Why it “wreaked havoc” (as per the user’s phrasing):
The phrasing “wreaked havoc” might refer to recent claims by Iranian sources and some media reports about the missile’s effectiveness in penetrating Israeli defenses and causing damage. While Israel’s sophisticated air defense systems, such as Iron Dome and Arrow, are designed to intercept such threats, the Sajil’s speed, maneuverability, and solid-fuel nature present a significant challenge. The use of “dancing” in the description implies that its flight path might be erratic or designed to evade interception, potentially contributing to its ability to “shatter” defenses as some sources suggest.
In summary, the Sajil 2 is considered a dangerous weapon due to its rapid launch capability, long range, high speed, maneuverability, and improved accuracy. Its recent alleged combat deployment against Israel underscores its threat in the ongoing regional tensions.