Sign In Sign In

Continue with Google
or use

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sorry, you do not have permission to ask a question, You must login to ask a question.

Continue with Google
or use

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

Nuq4

Nuq4 Logo Nuq4 Logo
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Nuq4 Shop
  • Become a Member

Geography

Share
  • Facebook
0 Followers
3 Answers
155 Questions
  • Recent Questions
  • Most Answered
  • No Answers
  • Most Visited
  • Most Voted

Nuq4 Latest Questions

  • 0
Ali1234Researcher
In: Countries, Saudi Arabia

Were the effects of radiation found in Saudi Arabia and the Gulf countries?

  • 0
  1. Ali1234 Researcher
    Added an answer on June 22, 2025 at 1:59 pm

    In response to recent events, particularly US military strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities, Saudi Arabia and other Gulf countries have confirmed that no radioactive effects or abnormal radiation levels have been detected in their environment. Specifically: * Saudi Arabia's Nuclear and RadiologicalRead more

    In response to recent events, particularly US military strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities, Saudi Arabia and other Gulf countries have confirmed that no radioactive effects or abnormal radiation levels have been detected in their environment.
    Specifically:
    * Saudi Arabia’s Nuclear and Radiological Regulatory Commission (NRRC) has repeatedly stated that radiation levels across the Kingdom remain normal and the environment is safe. They have been monitoring developments around the clock and have preventive measures in place.
    * Other Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries, including Kuwait, the UAE, Qatar, Bahrain, and Iraq, have also reported similar findings, with their respective regulatory bodies confirming stable radiation levels in their airspace and waters.
    * The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) has also echoed these findings, stating that no increase in off-site radiation levels has been reported after the strikes, noting that the targeted facilities in Iran either contained no nuclear material or only small quantities, limiting the risk of widespread radioactive contamination.
    It’s important to differentiate between this recent situation and general background radiation. The Arabian Peninsula, like all regions, experiences natural background radiation from sources such as:
    * Terrestrial radioisotopes: Naturally occurring radioactive elements like Uranium, Thorium, and Potassium found in soil, rock, and building materials.
    * Cosmic radiation: Radiation from space.
    While studies have looked at natural radioactivity levels in groundwater and building materials in the region, particularly in Saudi Arabia and the UAE, these are generally within safe limits, though some localized areas might have higher concentrations.
    In summary, regarding the recent military actions, the official statements from Saudi Arabia and other Gulf countries, supported by the IAEA, confirm that no adverse effects of radiation have been found.

    See less
    • 0
    • Share
      Share
      • Share onFacebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
  • 1 Answer
Answer
  • 0
Zoe
In: Egypt, make money

how to make money online in egypt

  • 0
  • 0 Answers
Answer
  • 0
Ali1234Researcher
In: Iran, Israel

Can Israel really destroy Iran's underground fortress?

  • 0
  1. Ali1234 Researcher
    Added an answer on June 21, 2025 at 2:33 am

    While Israel has expressed its intent to disrupt Iran's nuclear program, the complete destruction of Iran's most heavily fortified underground nuclear facilities, particularly the Fordow Fuel Enrichment Plant, is widely believed to be beyond Israel's current independent capabilities. Here's why: * FRead more

    While Israel has expressed its intent to disrupt Iran’s nuclear program, the complete destruction of Iran’s most heavily fortified underground nuclear facilities, particularly the Fordow Fuel Enrichment Plant, is widely believed to be beyond Israel’s current independent capabilities.
    Here’s why:
    * Fordow’s Depth and Hardening: The Fordow facility is buried deep within a mountain, reportedly 80-90 meters (260-300 feet) underground, and is heavily reinforced. This makes it extremely difficult to penetrate with conventional weaponry.
    * “Bunker Buster” Limitations: While Israel possesses some “bunker buster” bombs (like the GBU-28 and BLU-109), these have a shallower penetration range and are not considered powerful enough to reach Fordow’s deepest sections.
    * US-Exclusive Capability: The only weapon widely believed to be capable of destroying Fordow is the GBU-57 Massive Ordnance Penetrator (MOP), a 30,000-pound (13,600kg) precision-guided bomb. The United States is the only country that possesses the GBU-57, and it can only be delivered by a US B-2 stealth bomber.
    * Need for Multiple Strikes: Even with the MOP, experts suggest that multiple sequential strikes would likely be needed to achieve full destruction of such a deeply buried and hardened facility.
    What Israel can and has targeted:
    Israel has reportedly focused its strikes on other Iranian nuclear and military sites, including:
    * Natanz enrichment plant: This is Iran’s main enrichment site, and while parts of it are underground, it’s considered less deeply buried than Fordow. Israeli strikes have reportedly damaged its subterranean centrifuge halls.
    * Centrifuge workshops near Tehran.
    * Laboratories in Isfahan.
    * Arak heavy water reactor: Recent reports indicate damage to key buildings at this facility.
    In summary:
    While Israel is actively seeking to degrade Iran’s nuclear capabilities, completely destroying heavily fortified underground “fortresses” like Fordow likely requires the deployment of the US’s most advanced “bunker buster” bombs and the aircraft to deliver them. Without direct US involvement or the transfer of these specific capabilities, a full destruction of Fordow by Israel alone is considered highly improbable.

    See less
    • 0
    • Share
      Share
      • Share onFacebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
  • 1 Answer
Answer
  • 0
Wahab SaeedResearcher
In: Saudi Arabia, TikTok

How to use TikTok in Saudi Arabia

  • 0
  • 0 Answers
Answer
  • 0
Ali1234Researcher
In: Israel

How many Iranian nuclear scientists did Israel target and martyr before the ceasefire?

  • 0
  1. Ali1234 Researcher
    Added an answer on June 24, 2025 at 8:57 am

    According to recent reports, Israel targeted and killed at least 14 Iranian nuclear scientists before the recent ceasefire. Nine of these scientists were killed in Israel's initial wave of attacks on June 13th. An additional scientist, Mohammad Reza Sedighi Saber, was reported killed in an Israeli sRead more

    According to recent reports, Israel targeted and killed at least 14 Iranian nuclear scientists before the recent ceasefire.
    Nine of these scientists were killed in Israel’s initial wave of attacks on June 13th. An additional scientist, Mohammad Reza Sedighi Saber, was reported killed in an Israeli strike on June 24th, shortly before the ceasefire took effect.
    These targeted killings were described by Israeli officials as an “unprecedented attack on the brains behind Iran’s nuclear program.”

    See less
    • 0
    • Share
      Share
      • Share onFacebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
  • 1 Answer
Answer
  • 0
Ali1234Researcher
In: Iran

Is Iran about to conduct a nuclear test?

  • 0
  1. Ali1234 Researcher
    Added an answer on June 14, 2025 at 1:23 pm

    The situation regarding Iran's nuclear program is highly dynamic and has escalated significantly in the past 24-48 hours, as of June 14, 2025. Here's a summary of the current situation and what it implies for a potential nuclear test: * Recent Israeli Strikes: Israel conducted significant military oRead more

    The situation regarding Iran’s nuclear program is highly dynamic and has escalated significantly in the past 24-48 hours, as of June 14, 2025.
    Here’s a summary of the current situation and what it implies for a potential nuclear test:
    * Recent Israeli Strikes: Israel conducted significant military operations against Iranian nuclear and military sites on June 13-14, 2025. These strikes targeted facilities like Natanz and Isfahan, damaging or destroying key infrastructure related to uranium enrichment and conversion. Some reports indicate destruction of the above-ground Pilot Fuel Enrichment Plant at Natanz and damage to electricity infrastructure, potentially impacting centrifuges in the underground facilities.
    * IAEA Concerns and Censure: The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Board of Governors recently censured Iran for failing to cooperate with inspectors and provide explanations for uranium traces found at undeclared sites. The IAEA has expressed serious concerns about Iran’s rapid accumulation of uranium enriched to up to 60% fissile purity, which is close to weapons-grade (90%). Reports indicate Iran has enough 60% enriched uranium for several nuclear weapons if further enriched.
    * Iran’s Response: In response to the IAEA censure, Iran announced it would establish a third enrichment site and increase its production of enriched materials. Iran has consistently maintained its nuclear program is for peaceful purposes.
    * “Breakout Time” Shortened: Analysts suggest Iran’s “breakout time” (the time needed to produce enough weapons-grade uranium for a bomb) has drastically shortened to days or weeks, a significant reduction from the estimated year under the 2015 nuclear deal (JCPOA).
    * No Explicit Indication of Imminent Test, But Risk Increased: While there’s no direct intelligence confirming an imminent nuclear test, the escalating tensions, Iran’s rapid enrichment advancements, and the recent Israeli strikes have significantly heightened concerns that Iran might accelerate its efforts to develop a nuclear weapon and potentially conduct a test. Some experts suggest that if Israel continues to attack Iran’s nuclear and military facilities, Iran might have a strong incentive to quickly assemble a rudimentary nuclear weapon.
    * Challenges of a Test for Iran: If Iran were to build a limited number of nuclear weapons (e.g., 9 as estimated by some), it’s unclear if they would be willing to “spend” one on a test, as it would deplete their limited arsenal. However, a test would undeniably signal their new nuclear status.
    In conclusion, while an imminent nuclear test isn’t definitively confirmed, the current environment is extremely volatile. Iran’s nuclear program is advancing rapidly, and the recent events have amplified the possibility of Iran pursuing a nuclear weapon and, subsequently, a test as a show of capability. International concern is at an all-time high.

    See less
    • 0
    • Share
      Share
      • Share onFacebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
  • 1 Answer
Answer
  • 0
Ali1234Researcher
In: India, Journalism, Media, Social Media

Afridi declared a social media post attributed to himself regarding India as fake, what is written in the post?

  • 0
  1. Ali1234 Researcher
    Added an answer on June 8, 2025 at 4:00 am

    There have been multiple instances of Shahid Afridi debunking fake social media posts attributed to him. Most recently, in June 2025, an AI-generated video falsely claimed Shahid Afridi's death and burial in Karachi, featuring fabricated condolence messages from celebrities and politicians. This wasRead more

    There have been multiple instances of Shahid Afridi debunking fake social media posts attributed to him.
    Most recently, in June 2025, an AI-generated video falsely claimed Shahid Afridi’s death and burial in Karachi, featuring fabricated condolence messages from celebrities and politicians. This was a deepfake that Afridi confirmed was fake.
    In the past, he has also been reported to have clarified that he did not utter a word against Imran Khan in a social media post, and he also urged fans to report a fake Twitter account impersonating his daughter.
    While Afridi has often been in the news for his critical statements about India and the Indian Army, particularly following incidents like the Pahalgam terror attack, the specific “fake post” he declared fake in recent news refers to the fabricated video about his death.

    See less
    • 0
    • Share
      Share
      • Share onFacebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
  • 1 Answer
Answer
  • 0
Ali1234Researcher
In: China, India

Why did China ban the export of rare earth metals to India?

  • 0
  1. Ali1234 Researcher
    Added an answer on June 8, 2025 at 6:25 am

    China has recently begun restricting the export of certain rare earth minerals and products containing them, including rare earth magnets, and these restrictions are impacting India significantly. While China has not explicitly announced a blanket "ban" specifically targeting India, the tightened exRead more

    China has recently begun restricting the export of certain rare earth minerals and products containing them, including rare earth magnets, and these restrictions are impacting India significantly. While China has not explicitly announced a blanket “ban” specifically targeting India, the tightened export controls are being applied in a way that is creating challenges for Indian companies.
    Here’s why China is implementing these restrictions, and how it affects India:
    China’s Reasons for Export Controls:
    * Geopolitical Leverage: China is the world’s largest producer and processor of rare earth elements, effectively dominating the global supply chain. It is increasingly “weaponizing” this dominance as a tool for geopolitical leverage against various countries, including in the context of trade disputes and broader international relations. This has been seen before, such as their temporary ban on rare earth exports to Japan in 2010.
    * National Security and Non-Proliferation Concerns: China cites national security and non-proliferation concerns as reasons for requiring special export licenses for these materials. This allows them to scrutinize the end-use of rare earths and ensure they are not used for purposes deemed sensitive or routed to countries that China views as adversaries.
    * Controlling the Supply Chain: China aims to maintain and strengthen its control over the entire rare earth supply chain, from mining to processing and the production of advanced materials like magnets. This strategic control gives them significant economic and political power.
    * Environmental Concerns (partially): While not the primary driver for these recent restrictions, the extraction and processing of rare earths are environmentally intensive. China has faced domestic environmental challenges related to this industry, and controlling exports can be seen as a way to manage production and environmental impact, though this is often a secondary consideration compared to economic and geopolitical objectives.
    Impact on India:
    * Disrupted Supply Chains: Indian automakers, in particular, are facing severe disruptions as they rely heavily on rare earth magnets from China for their production, especially for electric vehicles (EVs). Shipments to India have reportedly been rejected or held up at Chinese ports, while similar shipments to other countries have been approved.
    * Economic Vulnerability: India’s significant dependence on China for rare earths highlights its economic vulnerability. The current restrictions are forcing Indian industries to scramble for alternative sources or face production halts and potential price increases for consumers.
    * Push for Domestic Production: The situation is prompting India to accelerate efforts to develop its own domestic rare earth mining and processing capabilities, and to forge new partnerships for critical mineral supplies. However, establishing such a supply chain takes significant time and investment.
    In essence, China’s actions are part of a broader strategy to exert its influence and secure its strategic interests by controlling access to critical minerals essential for modern technology and defense. This has direct and significant implications for countries like India that are heavily reliant on Chinese rare earth exports.

    See less
    • 0
    • Share
      Share
      • Share onFacebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
  • 1 Answer
Answer
  • 0
Ali1234Researcher
In: India

Why has the latest British F-35 aircraft been stuck in India for 10 days?

  • 0
  1. Ali1234 Researcher
    Added an answer on June 25, 2025 at 10:30 am

    A British F-35B fighter jet has been stranded in India for over 10 days due to a hydraulic system failure. Here's a breakdown of what happened: * Emergency Landing: The F-35B, part of the UK's HMS Prince of Wales Carrier Strike Group, was conducting drills in the Arabian Sea when it encountered badRead more

    A British F-35B fighter jet has been stranded in India for over 10 days due to a hydraulic system failure.
    Here’s a breakdown of what happened:
    * Emergency Landing: The F-35B, part of the UK’s HMS Prince of Wales Carrier Strike Group, was conducting drills in the Arabian Sea when it encountered bad weather and was unable to return to its aircraft carrier. It initially sought permission to land at Thiruvananthapuram International Airport in Kerala due to low fuel.
    * Technical Snag: After landing safely, the aircraft developed a hydraulic system issue, rendering it unable to take off again. Hydraulics are crucial for various flight control functions.
    * Failed Repair Attempts: A British team of technicians from the Carrier Strike Group inspected the aircraft but were unable to fix the glitch.
    * Specialist Team Dispatched: Due to the complexity of the issue, a larger team of specialist engineers from the UK, possibly including American technicians, is being dispatched with necessary equipment to carry out the repairs.
    * Security Concerns: The jet, which is a highly classified piece of military technology, has been parked in the open at the civilian airport, raising concerns about its security and exposure to foreign eyes. The British authorities have reportedly declined an offer from Air India to move it into a hangar, citing these concerns. Indian authorities have tasked the Central Industrial Security Force (CISF) with guarding the jet round the clock.
    * Possible Airlift: If repairs prove unsuccessful, airlifting the aircraft back to the UK is being considered as an option.
    The incident highlights the complexities of maintaining advanced military aircraft and the logistical challenges that can arise when they encounter technical issues far from their home base.

    See less
    • 0
    • Share
      Share
      • Share onFacebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
  • 1 Answer
Answer
  • 0
Zoe
In: make money, Malaysia

how to make money online malaysia

  • 0
  • 0 Answers
Answer

Sidebar

Explore

  • Nuq4 Shop
  • Become a Member

Footer

Get answers to all your questions, big or small, on Nuq4.com. Our database is constantly growing, so you can always find the information you need.

Download Android App

© Copyright 2024, Nuq4.com

Legal

Terms and Conditions
Privacy Policy
Cookie Policy
DMCA Policy
Payment Rules
Refund Policy
Nuq4 Giveaway Terms and Conditions

Contact

Contact Us
Chat on Telegram
en_USEnglish
arالعربية en_USEnglish
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.OkCookie Policy