Sign In Sign In

Continue with Google
or use

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sorry, you do not have permission to ask a question, You must login to ask a question.

Continue with Google
or use

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

Nuq4

Nuq4 Logo Nuq4 Logo
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Nuq4 Shop
  • Become a Member

Geography

Share
  • Facebook
0 Followers
3 Answers
208 Questions
  • Recent Questions
  • Most Answered
  • No Answers
  • Most Visited
  • Most Voted

Nuq4 Latest Questions

  • 0
Parvati
In: United States

Who was the first president of the United States?

  • 0
  1. Zia
    Added an answer on November 16, 2023 at 1:12 pm

    George Washington was the first president of the United States. He served two terms, from 1789 to 1797. Washington was a key figure in the American Revolution and helped to lead the country to victory over Great Britain. He was also a major figure in the creation of the United States Constitution anRead more

    George Washington was the first president of the United States. He served two terms, from 1789 to 1797. Washington was a key figure in the American Revolution and helped to lead the country to victory over Great Britain. He was also a major figure in the creation of the United States Constitution and was unanimously chosen as the first president by the Electoral College.

    See less
    • 0
    • Share
      Share
      • Share onFacebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
  • 1 Answer
Answer
  • 0
Ali1234Researcher
In: Boycott, Countries, Pakistan, Zara

Why are consumers in Muslim countries, including Pakistan, calling for a boycott of the fashion brand 'Zara'?

  • 0
  1. Ali1234 Researcher
    Added an answer on July 14, 2025 at 12:59 am

    Consumers in Muslim countries, including Pakistan, have called for a boycott of the fashion brand Zara primarily due to two main reasons, both tied to the ongoing Israel-Palestine conflict: Controversial Advertising Campaign (December 2023): The "The Jacket" Campaign: In December 2023, Zara launchedRead more

    Consumers in Muslim countries, including Pakistan, have called for a boycott of the fashion brand Zara primarily due to two main reasons, both tied to the ongoing Israel-Palestine conflict:

    1. Controversial Advertising Campaign (December 2023):
      • The “The Jacket” Campaign: In December 2023, Zara launched an advertising campaign titled “The Jacket” which featured mannequins with missing limbs and statues wrapped in white shrouds amidst what appeared to be rubble and destroyed environments.
      • Public Outcry: Many social media users and activists quickly drew parallels between these images and the devastating scenes emerging from Gaza, where thousands of Palestinians, including women and children, have been killed, and bodies are often wrapped in white cloths for burial according to Islamic tradition.
      • Accusations of Insensitivity: The campaign was widely criticized as “tone-deaf,” insensitive, and even mocking the suffering and death in Gaza. Hashtags like #BoycottZara trended globally, including in Muslim-majority countries.
      • Zara’s Response: Zara’s parent company, Inditex, removed the controversial images from its website and social media. They stated that the campaign was conceived in July and photographed in September (before the escalation of the conflict in October 2023) and was intended to showcase craft-made garments in an artistic context resembling a sculptor’s studio. They expressed regret for the “misunderstanding” and the offense caused. However, for many, the damage was already done.
    2. Previous Anti-Palestinian Comments by a Zara Executive (2021):
      • Vanessa Perilman’s Remarks: In 2021, screenshots circulated online showing an exchange between Zara’s head designer for the women’s department, Vanessa Perilman, and Palestinian model Qaher Harhash. In these messages, Perilman made inflammatory and anti-Palestinian comments, suggesting, among other things, that Palestinians were uneducated and that Israelis did not teach children to hate.
      • Renewed Outrage: While Zara’s parent company, Inditex, at the time distanced itself from Perilman’s remarks, stating they do not tolerate disrespect for any culture or religion, these comments resurfaced during the December 2023 controversy, further fueling calls for a boycott. Many consumers felt that the brand had a history of insensitivity towards Palestinians.

    These incidents, particularly the perceived insensitivity of the advertising campaign amidst a humanitarian crisis in Gaza, led to widespread anger and calls for boycotts from consumers, activists, and pro-Palestinian groups in Muslim countries like Pakistan and beyond. The boycotts are a form of consumer activism aimed at pressuring brands to be more socially responsible and to align with humanitarian values.

    See less
    • 0
    • Share
      Share
      • Share onFacebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
  • 1 Answer
Answer
  • 0
Ali1234Researcher
In: India, Pakistan

Is the India-Pakistan Simla Agreement going to end?

  • 0
  1. Ali1234 Researcher
    Added an answer on June 5, 2025 at 1:21 pm

    While Pakistan's Defence Minister Khawaja Asif recently stated that the 1972 Simla Agreement has lost its "sanctity" and is a "dead document" due to India's "unilateral actions," Pakistan's Foreign Ministry has clarified that no formal decision has been taken to scrap any bilateral agreements with IRead more

    While Pakistan’s Defence Minister Khawaja Asif recently stated that the 1972 Simla Agreement has lost its “sanctity” and is a “dead document” due to India’s “unilateral actions,” Pakistan’s Foreign Ministry has clarified that no formal decision has been taken to scrap any bilateral agreements with India, including the Simla Agreement.
    Therefore, as of now, the Simla Agreement is still officially in effect. However, the comments from the Defense Minister highlight the ongoing tensions between the two countries and Pakistan’s perception that the agreement’s relevance has diminished due to recent events.
    The Simla Agreement, signed after the 1971 Indo-Pak war, aims to resolve disputes between India and Pakistan bilaterally and peacefully.

    See less
    • 0
    • Share
      Share
      • Share onFacebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
  • 1 Answer
Answer
  • 0
Ali1234Researcher
In: Israel

How much damage did Israel suffer from the Iranian attack?

  • 0
  1. Ali1234 Researcher
    Added an answer on June 20, 2025 at 1:07 am

    In the Iranian attack on Israel in April 2024, Israel suffered relatively minor damage and casualties, largely due to successful interceptions by its air defense systems, assisted by a coalition including the US, UK, France, and Jordan. Here's a summary of the damage and casualties reported: Damage:Read more

    In the Iranian attack on Israel in April 2024, Israel suffered relatively minor damage and casualties, largely due to successful interceptions by its air defense systems, assisted by a coalition including the US, UK, France, and Jordan.
    Here’s a summary of the damage and casualties reported:
    Damage:
    * Airbases: The Nevatim and Ramon Airbases in southern Israel sustained minor damage. While some Iranian missiles did strike these bases, they remained operational.
    * Other Infrastructure: A US official stated that at least nine Iranian missiles struck two Israeli airbases, causing minor damage. There were also reports of some shrapnel falling in Jordan.
    * More recent reports (from June 2025, which might refer to ongoing or subsequent attacks) indicate more significant damage, including:
    * Iranian missiles hitting a major hospital in southern Israel and striking residential buildings in Tel Aviv.
    * Damage to a central rail station and the Microsoft office in the Gav-Yam Negev advanced technologies park.
    * An oil refinery in Haifa was hit, causing fires and damage.
    Casualties:
    * April 2024 Attack:
    * One 7-year-old Israeli Bedouin girl was critically injured by shrapnel.
    * Thirty-one other people suffered minor injuries while rushing to shelters or were treated for anxiety.
    * More Recent Reports (June 2025 – potentially including subsequent attacks):
    * Casualties have been significantly higher, with at least 24 people killed in Israel and over 200 wounded.
    * Specific incidents mentioned include deaths in an apartment building in the Galilee region, and an 80-year-old woman, a 69-year-old woman, and a 10-year-old boy killed in central Israel.
    * Five people were lightly injured in Beersheba after a direct missile hit, and 30 were treated for panic.
    It’s important to note that initial assessments from April 2024 emphasized the limited damage due to high interception rates. However, more recent reports from June 2025 suggest an escalation in the conflict with increased Iranian missile attacks that have caused more significant damage and casualties, including in civilian areas.

    See less
    • 0
    • Share
      Share
      • Share onFacebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
  • 1 Answer
Answer
  • 0
Ali1234Researcher
In: China

Who won the race between humans and robots in China?

  • 0
  1. Ali1234 Researcher
    Added an answer on June 19, 2025 at 3:55 am

    humanoid robots participated in a marathon alongside humans in the Chinese capital Beijing. The world's first human and humanoid robot half marathon was a 21-kilometer race in which 21 bipedal robots participated along with 10,000 people. Watch the AFP video

    humanoid robots participated in a marathon alongside humans in the Chinese capital Beijing. The world's first human and humanoid robot half marathon was a 21-kilometer race in which 21 bipedal robots participated along with 10,000 people. Watch the AFP video
    See less
    • 0
    • Share
      Share
      • Share onFacebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
  • 1 Answer
Answer
  • 0
Ali1234Researcher
In: Iran

Is Iran about to conduct a nuclear test?

  • 0
  1. Ali1234 Researcher
    Added an answer on June 14, 2025 at 1:23 pm

    The situation regarding Iran's nuclear program is highly dynamic and has escalated significantly in the past 24-48 hours, as of June 14, 2025. Here's a summary of the current situation and what it implies for a potential nuclear test: * Recent Israeli Strikes: Israel conducted significant military oRead more

    The situation regarding Iran’s nuclear program is highly dynamic and has escalated significantly in the past 24-48 hours, as of June 14, 2025.
    Here’s a summary of the current situation and what it implies for a potential nuclear test:
    * Recent Israeli Strikes: Israel conducted significant military operations against Iranian nuclear and military sites on June 13-14, 2025. These strikes targeted facilities like Natanz and Isfahan, damaging or destroying key infrastructure related to uranium enrichment and conversion. Some reports indicate destruction of the above-ground Pilot Fuel Enrichment Plant at Natanz and damage to electricity infrastructure, potentially impacting centrifuges in the underground facilities.
    * IAEA Concerns and Censure: The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Board of Governors recently censured Iran for failing to cooperate with inspectors and provide explanations for uranium traces found at undeclared sites. The IAEA has expressed serious concerns about Iran’s rapid accumulation of uranium enriched to up to 60% fissile purity, which is close to weapons-grade (90%). Reports indicate Iran has enough 60% enriched uranium for several nuclear weapons if further enriched.
    * Iran’s Response: In response to the IAEA censure, Iran announced it would establish a third enrichment site and increase its production of enriched materials. Iran has consistently maintained its nuclear program is for peaceful purposes.
    * “Breakout Time” Shortened: Analysts suggest Iran’s “breakout time” (the time needed to produce enough weapons-grade uranium for a bomb) has drastically shortened to days or weeks, a significant reduction from the estimated year under the 2015 nuclear deal (JCPOA).
    * No Explicit Indication of Imminent Test, But Risk Increased: While there’s no direct intelligence confirming an imminent nuclear test, the escalating tensions, Iran’s rapid enrichment advancements, and the recent Israeli strikes have significantly heightened concerns that Iran might accelerate its efforts to develop a nuclear weapon and potentially conduct a test. Some experts suggest that if Israel continues to attack Iran’s nuclear and military facilities, Iran might have a strong incentive to quickly assemble a rudimentary nuclear weapon.
    * Challenges of a Test for Iran: If Iran were to build a limited number of nuclear weapons (e.g., 9 as estimated by some), it’s unclear if they would be willing to “spend” one on a test, as it would deplete their limited arsenal. However, a test would undeniably signal their new nuclear status.
    In conclusion, while an imminent nuclear test isn’t definitively confirmed, the current environment is extremely volatile. Iran’s nuclear program is advancing rapidly, and the recent events have amplified the possibility of Iran pursuing a nuclear weapon and, subsequently, a test as a show of capability. International concern is at an all-time high.

    See less
    • 0
    • Share
      Share
      • Share onFacebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
  • 1 Answer
Answer
  • 0
Ali1234Researcher
In: Grand Mosque, Saudi Arabia

Military helicopters over the Grand Mosque and the 'mission to protect God's guests': Why did Saudi Arabia install a defensive missile system in Mecca?

  • 0
  1. Ali1234 Researcher
    Added an answer on July 16, 2025 at 3:12 am

    Saudi Arabia's decision to deploy defensive missile systems, such as the U.S.-made Patriot missile systems, around Mecca, particularly during the Hajj pilgrimage, is driven by a critical need to protect its holy sites and the millions of pilgrims who visit them annually from external threats. Here'sRead more

    Saudi Arabia’s decision to deploy defensive missile systems, such as the U.S.-made Patriot missile systems, around Mecca, particularly during the Hajj pilgrimage, is driven by a critical need to protect its holy sites and the millions of pilgrims who visit them annually from external threats.

    Here’s a breakdown of the reasons:

    1. Houthi Missile and Drone Threats:
      • Since 2015, Saudi Arabia has been engaged in a conflict with the Houthi rebels in Yemen. The Houthis, backed by Iran, have repeatedly launched ballistic missiles and drones towards Saudi territory, including critical infrastructure, airports, and even holy cities.
      • There have been multiple documented instances of Houthi missiles being intercepted by Saudi air defenses near Mecca, Taif (a city close to Mecca), and Jeddah. While the Houthis often claim to be targeting military installations, Saudi Arabia asserts that these attacks are aimed at disrupting the Hajj and causing casualties, including among pilgrims.
      • The deployment of missile systems is a direct response to these tangible and ongoing threats from Yemen, demonstrating Saudi Arabia’s commitment to defending its sovereignty and the safety of those within its borders.
    2. “Mission to Protect God’s Guests”:
      • Saudi Arabia considers itself the “Custodian of the Two Holy Mosques” (Mecca and Medina) and views the protection of pilgrims as a paramount religious and national duty.
      • The Hajj pilgrimage brings millions of Muslims from around the world to Mecca, creating a massive gathering that could be a vulnerable target. Ensuring the safety and security of these “Guests of the Merciful” is a non-negotiable priority for the Saudi government.
      • The deployment of advanced air defense systems is part of a multi-layered security strategy that includes aerial surveillance by military helicopters, ground forces, and strict Hajj permit regulations, all aimed at creating a secure environment for pilgrims.
    3. Regional Tensions and Deterrence:
      • The broader geopolitical landscape in the Middle East, with ongoing conflicts (like in Gaza) and heightened regional tensions, contributes to Saudi Arabia’s proactive defense posture.
      • Deploying visible and effective missile defense systems serves as a deterrent to any potential aggressors, signaling that Saudi Arabia is prepared to defend its most sacred sites and its people. It sends a clear message that attacks on these areas will not be tolerated.
    4. Technological Preparedness:
      • The Patriot missile system is an advanced, U.S.-made weapon designed to counter ballistic missiles, cruise missiles, and drones. Its deployment signifies Saudi Arabia’s reliance on cutting-edge defense technology to protect its airspace. Saudi Arabia has also acquired other advanced systems like THAAD for longer-range defense.

    In essence, the installation of defensive missile systems in Mecca is a necessary and strategic measure driven by credible threats, a deep sense of religious duty to protect pilgrims, and the broader aim of ensuring national security and stability in a volatile region.

    See less
    • 0
    • Share
      Share
      • Share onFacebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
  • 1 Answer
Answer
  • 0
Ali1234Researcher
In: Crypto Coin, Europe

What would happen if Russian gas stopped flowing to Western Europe?

  • 0
  1. Ali1234 Researcher
    Added an answer on July 21, 2025 at 1:46 am

    If Russian gas were to completely stop flowing to Western Europe, the consequences would be significant, though less catastrophic than they might have been a few years ago. Europe has made substantial progress in reducing its reliance on Russian gas since the 2022 invasion of Ukraine. Here's a breakRead more

    If Russian gas were to completely stop flowing to Western Europe, the consequences would be significant, though less catastrophic than they might have been a few years ago. Europe has made substantial progress in reducing its reliance on Russian gas since the 2022 invasion of Ukraine.

    Here’s a breakdown of what would likely happen:

    1. Short-Term Impacts (Immediate to a few months):

    • Further Price Spikes and Volatility: Even though Russian gas imports have drastically fallen, a complete halt would still remove a portion of supply, leading to an immediate surge in natural gas prices across Europe. This volatility would make energy planning for businesses and households extremely difficult.
    • Increased Competition for LNG: European countries would intensify their efforts to secure Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) from global markets (e.g., US, Qatar, Norway). This would further tighten the global LNG market and likely drive up global prices, affecting other importing regions as well.
    • Gas Rationing Risks (especially for industry): While households and essential services are typically protected, energy-intensive industries (like chemicals, fertilizers, steel, glass, ceramics) would face the highest risk of gas rationing. This could lead to production cuts, factory closures, and job losses in affected sectors.
    • Economic Slowdown/Recessionary Pressure: Higher energy costs would act as a drag on economic growth, increasing inflation and potentially pushing some European economies into recession or exacerbating existing slowdowns.
    • Strain on Energy Infrastructure: While Europe has built new LNG import terminals and strengthened interconnectors, a sudden complete cutoff could still strain the existing infrastructure, leading to bottlenecks in gas distribution.
    • Increased Reliance on Alternative Fuels: Some power plants might switch to coal or oil where feasible, increasing carbon emissions in the short term.
    • Regional Disparities: Countries that still have a higher reliance on Russian pipeline gas (e.g., some Central and Eastern European nations like Slovakia, Austria, and Hungary) would face more severe challenges and higher energy bills compared to those with diversified supplies and extensive LNG import capacity.

    2. Mid-to-Long-Term Impacts (Several months to a few years):

    • Accelerated Diversification: Europe would double down on its efforts to diversify gas supplies. This means more LNG import terminals, new pipeline connections (e.g., from Norway, Azerbaijan), and strengthening existing infrastructure.
    • Faster Renewable Energy Deployment: The imperative for energy security would further accelerate investments in renewable energy sources (solar, wind, geothermal). This would also involve significant investments in electricity grid upgrades and energy storage solutions.
    • Energy Efficiency Measures: Governments and industries would be even more incentivized to implement energy efficiency measures and reduce overall gas consumption through behavioral changes and technological upgrades.
    • Structural Economic Shifts: Industries that rely heavily on natural gas might face long-term challenges, potentially leading to some relocation of production or adoption of new, less gas-intensive processes.
    • Geopolitical Realignments: The complete severing of gas ties would further diminish Russia’s energy leverage over Europe, solidifying a new geopolitical energy landscape where Europe seeks partners in more stable and democratic regions.
    • Impact on Ukraine (Transit Fees): If the remaining gas transit through Ukraine were to cease, Ukraine would lose significant transit fees, impacting its budget, though it has already prepared for this possibility.
    • Russia’s Financial Strain: A complete cutoff would represent a further major financial blow to Russia, significantly reducing its revenues from gas exports, which are less easily rerouted than oil due to pipeline infrastructure limitations. Russia would continue its pivot towards Asian markets, but building new large-scale pipeline infrastructure to Asia takes many years.

    What has already happened and mitigates the impact:

    • Significant Reduction in Russian Gas Imports: Since 2022, Europe has drastically cut its reliance on Russian pipeline gas. Russian gas imports to the EU have fallen from over 40% of total gas imports before the war to around 10-15% currently.
    • Increased LNG Imports: Europe has ramped up LNG imports, particularly from the US and Qatar, and invested in new regasification terminals.
    • Record Gas Storage Levels: European countries have prioritized filling their gas storage facilities to high levels, providing a crucial buffer against supply disruptions.
    • Demand Reduction: High prices and conservation efforts have led to a notable reduction in overall gas demand across Europe.

    In conclusion, while a complete halt of Russian gas flow would still cause immediate disruption and economic pain, particularly for certain industries and more dependent countries, Europe is far better prepared to manage such a scenario than it was a few years ago. The long-term trend points towards further diversification, accelerated renewable energy deployment, and a permanent reduction in reliance on Russian fossil fuels.

    See less
    • 0
    • Share
      Share
      • Share onFacebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
  • 1 Answer
Answer
  • 0
Ali1234Researcher
In: India, oil, Russia, Ukraine

Ukraine crisis: Why is India buying more oil from Russia?

  • 0
  1. Ali1234 Researcher
    Added an answer on July 21, 2025 at 1:39 am

    India's increased purchase of oil from Russia since the Ukraine crisis began is a complex issue driven by a combination of economic, energy security, and foreign policy considerations. It's not a simple alignment with Russia, but rather a strategic balancing act. Here are the key reasons: Deep DiscoRead more

    India’s increased purchase of oil from Russia since the Ukraine crisis began is a complex issue driven by a combination of economic, energy security, and foreign policy considerations. It’s not a simple alignment with Russia, but rather a strategic balancing act.

    Here are the key reasons:

    1. Deep Discounts and Economic Advantage:
      • Following Western sanctions and the withdrawal of many traditional buyers, Russia was forced to offer significant discounts on its crude oil.
      • India, as the world’s third-largest oil importer and consumer, saw an opportunity to secure cheaper energy supplies, which is crucial for managing inflation and maintaining economic stability for its large population.
      • Even with Western price caps (like the $60 per barrel G7 cap), Russia often finds ways to offer competitive rates, for example, by including transport and insurance costs, or by using a “shadow fleet” of tankers.
    2. Energy Security and Diversification:
      • India is heavily dependent on oil imports (over 85% of its crude oil needs). Its energy security strategy involves diversifying its sources of supply to reduce reliance on any single region or supplier.
      • Historically, India relied heavily on the Middle East. However, geopolitical tensions in the Middle East, particularly around the Strait of Hormuz (a critical chokepoint for a significant portion of global oil movement), have pushed India to seek alternative, more secure routes. Russian oil, often accessed through eastern routes (like the Eastern Maritime Corridor to Vladivostok), provides a valuable diversification against potential disruptions in the Middle East.
      • India has expanded its crude import sources from around 27 countries to about 40, reflecting this drive for diversification.
    3. “Strategic Autonomy” in Foreign Policy:
      • India has a long-standing foreign policy principle of “strategic autonomy,” meaning it prioritizes its national interests and avoids being drawn into blocs or taking sides in major global conflicts.
      • This approach allows India to maintain its historic, strategic partnership with Russia (especially in defense, where Russia remains a key arms supplier), while also deepening ties with Western nations like the US and Europe.
      • India has largely maintained a neutral stance on the Ukraine war, abstaining from most UN resolutions condemning Russia. It has consistently emphasized dialogue and diplomacy as the way forward.
      • Indian officials have openly stated that their primary responsibility is to secure affordable energy for their 1.4 billion people and that oil purchases are a legitimate aspect of their energy security.
    4. Established Infrastructure and Refining Capacity:
      • Indian refineries, especially private sector ones like Reliance Industries and Nayara Energy, are well-equipped to process various types of crude, including the Urals crude often supplied by Russia. They have adapted their refining and payment systems to handle Russian oil.

    Western Reactions and India’s Response:

    While Western nations, particularly the US and EU, have expressed concerns and even threatened secondary sanctions or tariffs on countries buying Russian oil, India has largely remained firm.

    • India’s Oil Minister, Hardeep Singh Puri, has repeatedly stated that India is not worried about such threats and is prepared to deal with any disruptions by further diversifying supplies from other emerging or established producers (like Brazil, Guyana, Canada, and traditional Middle Eastern sources if needed).
    • Recent EU sanctions specifically targeting refined petroleum products made from Russian crude in third countries like India could impact India’s $15 billion fuel exports to Europe. This forces India to walk a fine line between securing discounted crude and maintaining access to lucrative export markets.

    In essence, India’s increased oil imports from Russia are a pragmatic decision driven by its fundamental energy needs and a foreign policy that prioritizes national interests and strategic flexibility in a complex global environment.

    See less
    • 0
    • Share
      Share
      • Share onFacebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
  • 1 Answer
Answer
  • 0
Cora
In: Sports, United States

What are the most popular sports in the United States?

  • 0
  1. Dhruv
    Added an answer on November 26, 2023 at 9:37 pm

    In the United States, folks are big fans of football, basketball, baseball, and soccer. These sports really get people excited and bring communities together.

    In the United States, folks are big fans of football, basketball, baseball, and soccer. These sports really get people excited and bring communities together.

    See less
    • 0
    • Share
      Share
      • Share onFacebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
  • 1 Answer
Answer

Sidebar

Explore

  • Nuq4 Shop
  • Become a Member

Footer

Get answers to all your questions, big or small, on Nuq4.com. Our database is constantly growing, so you can always find the information you need.

Download Android App

© Copyright 2024, Nuq4.com

Legal

Terms and Conditions
Privacy Policy
Cookie Policy
DMCA Policy
Payment Rules
Refund Policy
Nuq4 Giveaway Terms and Conditions

Contact

Contact Us
Chat on Telegram
en_USEnglish
arالعربية en_USEnglish
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.OkCookie Policy