The Iran's Sajil 2 missile, also known as Sejjil 2, is considered a significant threat due to several factors: * Advanced Capabilities: The Sajil 2 is a two-stage, solid-fueled ballistic missile. This is a significant advancement over older liquid-fueled missiles like the Shahab-3, as solid-fuel misRead more
The Iran’s Sajil 2 missile, also known as Sejjil 2, is considered a significant threat due to several factors:
* Advanced Capabilities: The Sajil 2 is a two-stage, solid-fueled ballistic missile. This is a significant advancement over older liquid-fueled missiles like the Shahab-3, as solid-fuel missiles can be launched much more quickly with less preparation time, making them harder to detect and intercept before launch.
* Range: It has an estimated range of 2,000 to 2,500 kilometers, which allows it to reach all parts of Israel and beyond.
* Maneuverability and Speed: Reports suggest the Sajil 2 is highly maneuverable and capable of performing evasive maneuvers, including sharp angle strafes and dodges. It can reach very high speeds (Mach 11 to Mach 13 when re-entering the atmosphere, hitting the target at Mach 5), making it challenging for existing missile defense systems like Israel’s Iron Dome and Arrow systems to intercept. The term “dancing missile” likely refers to these reported evasive maneuvers, making it harder for air defenses to lock on.
* Accuracy: The Sajil 2 is equipped with an advanced guidance package, improving its accuracy significantly. Some reports claim its accuracy can be within 10 meters, though others suggest below 50 meters. Such precision increases its destructive potential against specific targets.
* Combat Use: Recent reports (June 2025) indicate that Iran has, for the first time, used the Sajil missile in combat conditions against Israel as part of “Operation True Promise 3,” claiming to have hit military targets, including Mossad offices, air force bases, and intelligence centers. While independent verification of the full extent of the damage is ongoing, the claims highlight its operational deployment.
Why it “wreaked havoc” (as per the user’s phrasing):
The phrasing “wreaked havoc” might refer to recent claims by Iranian sources and some media reports about the missile’s effectiveness in penetrating Israeli defenses and causing damage. While Israel’s sophisticated air defense systems, such as Iron Dome and Arrow, are designed to intercept such threats, the Sajil’s speed, maneuverability, and solid-fuel nature present a significant challenge. The use of “dancing” in the description implies that its flight path might be erratic or designed to evade interception, potentially contributing to its ability to “shatter” defenses as some sources suggest.
In summary, the Sajil 2 is considered a dangerous weapon due to its rapid launch capability, long range, high speed, maneuverability, and improved accuracy. Its recent alleged combat deployment against Israel underscores its threat in the ongoing regional tensions.
English 
العربية
As of Sunday, June 15, 2025, the tensions between Iran and Israel have escalated significantly, marking the third day of overt conflict. Here's a summary of what we know: Initiation of Conflict: * Friday, June 13, 2025: Israel launched major airstrikes on Iran, codenamed "Operation Rising Lion." TheRead more
As of Sunday, June 15, 2025, the tensions between Iran and Israel have escalated significantly, marking the third day of overt conflict. Here’s a summary of what we know:
See lessInitiation of Conflict:
* Friday, June 13, 2025: Israel launched major airstrikes on Iran, codenamed “Operation Rising Lion.” These attacks targeted Iran’s nuclear facilities, military installations, and reportedly killed several top Iranian military leaders and nuclear scientists, including IRGC commander Hossein Salami and Major General Mohammad Bagheri. Explosions were reported in Tehran and near nuclear sites like Natanz and Esfahan. Israel stated its aim was to “degrade, destroy, and remove the threat” of Iran’s nuclear weapons program.
* Friday, June 13, 2025 (Evening): Iran quickly retaliated with a large-scale attack on Israel, launching over 150 ballistic missiles and more than 100 drones, codenamed “Operation True Promise III.”
Escalation and Continued Strikes:
* Saturday, June 14, 2025: Both sides continued their strikes. Israel expanded its targets to include Iran’s energy industry, while Iranian missile and drone attacks on Israel continued, reportedly hitting cities like Haifa and Tel Aviv.
* Sunday, June 15, 2025: The exchange of strikes has continued for a third day. Israel has unleashed further airstrikes across Iran, threatening greater force. Some Iranian missiles have reportedly evaded Israeli air defenses and struck buildings in central Israel. Iran’s Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) claimed to have targeted Israel’s fuel infrastructure in response to Israeli strikes on its oil facilities.
Casualties and Damages:
* Iran: Iranian media has reported significant casualties, with unofficial tolls on Saturday stating 78 people killed and 329 injured in Tehran alone. Al Jazeera reports at least 80 people killed and 800 wounded across Iran over the past two days, including 20 children and nine nuclear scientists. Israeli strikes have caused fires at oil storage facilities in Tehran and other areas.
* Israel: Iran’s retaliatory strikes have also caused casualties. Israel’s Magen David Adom rescue service reported at least 10 people killed overnight and into Sunday, bringing Israel’s total death toll to 13. Reports indicate strikes hitting residential areas, with one attack in Bat Yam (a Tel Aviv suburb) killing at least six people, including two children, and wounding 180.
International Reaction:
* The United Nations Security Council held a meeting on Friday, June 13, to discuss the rising tensions.
* Calls for de-escalation are mounting from world leaders.
* The conflict has closed Israel’s main international airport and airspace for a third day.
Context and Broader Implications:
* This direct military confrontation marks a significant escalation in the long-standing “shadow war” between Israel and Iran, which previously involved proxy conflicts, cyberattacks, and targeted assassinations.
* The immediate catalyst was Israel’s initial strikes, which it justified by claiming Iran was close to developing a nuclear weapon, a day after the UN nuclear watchdog declared Iran wasn’t complying with nonproliferation agreements. Iran responded by stating it would create a new uranium enrichment facility.
* Experts are concerned about the potential for this conflict to escalate into a wider regional war, with implications for global energy markets.
* There are reports of discussions regarding regime change as a potential Israeli goal.