Donald Trump's policies on trade and welfare draw from a combination of his long-held personal beliefs, certain strands of Republican Party history, and conservative economic philosophies. Trade War (Protectionism): * Long-held personal conviction: Trump has advocated for tariffs and protectionist tRead more
Donald Trump’s policies on trade and welfare draw from a combination of his long-held personal beliefs, certain strands of Republican Party history, and conservative economic philosophies.
Trade War (Protectionism):
* Long-held personal conviction: Trump has advocated for tariffs and protectionist trade policies since the 1980s. He has consistently expressed the view that other countries have taken advantage of the United States through unfavorable trade deals, leading to job losses and a decline in American manufacturing. His core belief is that trade deficits are inherently harmful.
* “America First” ideology: His trade policies are a central component of his “America First” agenda, which prioritizes domestic industries, jobs, and economic security over global trade agreements.
* Historical Republican roots: While the Republican Party largely embraced free trade after the Cold War, it had a strong protectionist tradition from the days of Abraham Lincoln through the early 20th century. Trump has cited figures like William McKinley as influences on his anti-free trade views, arguing that the GOP “betrayed its roots” by becoming pro-free trade.
* Influence of advisors: During his campaigns, advisors like Peter Navarro, a strong proponent of tariffs, helped shape and articulate his trade policy.
* Addressing perceived unfair practices: The trade war with China, for example, was framed as a response to what the Trump administration considered unfair trade practices, intellectual property theft, and forced technology transfers by China.
Closing Welfare Institutions (Welfare Reform):
* Emphasis on work requirements and self-sufficiency: Trump’s approach to welfare programs has been largely driven by a belief that able-bodied adults receiving benefits should be required to work, participate in job training, or volunteer. This is rooted in the idea of promoting “self-sufficiency” and reducing what he views as “welfare dependency.”
* Fiscal conservatism: The desire to reduce federal spending and “protect taxpayer dollars” is also a significant driver behind proposals to tighten welfare eligibility and reduce program expenditures.
* Legacy of 1990s welfare reform: While Trump’s administration sought to expand work requirements, the concept itself is not new. The Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Act of 1996, signed by President Bill Clinton, significantly reformed welfare and introduced stricter work requirements. Trump’s policies build upon and seek to further extend these types of reforms.
* Criticism of “misplaced priorities”: The Trump administration has argued that welfare programs have deviated from their original purpose of assisting the “truly needy” and have instead expanded to include millions of able-bodied adults.
It’s important to note that while these policies have clear philosophical underpinnings, their implementation and impact have been subjects of considerable debate and economic analysis.
English 
العربية
Starlink service has not yet fully started in Pakistan due to a combination of regulatory hurdles, technical requirements, and strategic considerations. Here's a breakdown of the key reasons: * Temporary vs. Permanent Registration/Licensing: While Starlink received temporary registration from the PaRead more
Starlink service has not yet fully started in Pakistan due to a combination of regulatory hurdles, technical requirements, and strategic considerations. Here’s a breakdown of the key reasons:
See less* Temporary vs. Permanent Registration/Licensing: While Starlink received temporary registration from the Pakistan Space Activities Regulatory Board (PSARB) in March 2025, the Pakistan Telecommunication Authority (PTA) has decided not to issue a full operational license until Starlink completes all regulatory and technical requirements for permanent registration with PSARB. This distinction is a major point of delay.
* Complex Regulatory Framework: Pakistan has introduced new regulations, including the National Satellite Policy (2023) and the Pakistan Space Activities Rules (2024), to govern satellite telecommunications. Starlink needs to comply with these comprehensive frameworks, which adds layers of complexity to the licensing process.
* Security Clearances and Concerns: National security is a primary concern for Pakistan. Authorities are carefully reviewing Starlink’s operations to ensure it doesn’t compromise national security by creating loopholes for cyberattacks, espionage, or interference with critical infrastructure. There are also concerns about how satellite services could be used to bypass regulations on sensitive topics or in security-sensitive areas. Starlink needs to secure all necessary security clearances.
* Technical Requirements and Interference: The PTA and other stakeholders like the Frequency Allocation Board (FAB) and SUPARCO have raised concerns about potential interference between Starlink’s Low Earth Orbit (LEO) satellites and existing communication infrastructure, particularly Geostationary Satellite Orbit (GSO) systems. Starlink needs to ensure its operations do not disrupt existing networks and that its uplinks and downlinks are compatible.
* Establishment of Ground Stations: For Starlink to operate effectively in Pakistan, it needs to set up ground stations within the country. This involves significant infrastructure installations and logistical challenges.
* Integration with Existing Telecom Ecosystem: Ensuring seamless integration with Pakistan’s current telecom networks is another crucial aspect.
* Pricing Concerns: While not a direct cause of the delay in regulatory approval, the high pricing of Starlink’s hardware and monthly subscription fees could be a challenge for widespread adoption among average Pakistani consumers, even once services are launched.
* Potential Resistance from Local ISPs: Existing internet service providers in Pakistan may view Starlink’s entry as a threat to their market share, potentially leading to lobbying efforts or other forms of resistance that could indirectly impact the regulatory process.
Despite these challenges, Starlink has been preparing its infrastructure, and Pakistani officials have indicated ongoing discussions to finalize the regulatory framework. While an official launch date is still pending, some reports have suggested a potential launch by November 2025 if all legal and regulatory conditions are met.