The high failure rate in Pakistan's Civil Superior Services (CSS) exam is a persistent issue, with multiple contributing factors. Here's a breakdown of the main reasons: 1. Weak English Language and Writing Skills: * Poor Grammar and Composition: Many candidates struggle with basic English grammar,Read more
The high failure rate in Pakistan’s Civil Superior Services (CSS) exam is a persistent issue, with multiple contributing factors. Here’s a breakdown of the main reasons:
1. Weak English Language and Writing Skills:
* Poor Grammar and Composition: Many candidates struggle with basic English grammar, sentence structure, and coherent expression, which are crucial for the English Essay and English (Precis and Composition) papers – often the subjects where most candidates fail.
* Lack of Analytical and Critical Thinking: The exam demands more than rote memorization. Candidates often fail to analyze issues critically, develop strong arguments, and present their ideas with clarity and logical structure.
* Insufficient Writing Practice: Many aspirants do not practice writing full-length answers or essays under timed conditions, leading to slow writing speed, poorly structured responses, and incomplete papers in the actual exam.
* Reliance on Memorization over Understanding: Students often prioritize memorizing facts and information rather than developing a deep understanding of concepts and the ability to articulate their own reasoned perspectives.
2. Inadequate Preparation and Study Habits:
* Unstructured Preparation: Many students lack a proper strategic plan for their preparation, leading to disorganized study and inefficient use of time.
* Outdated Resources: Reliance on brief summaries, guidebooks, or outdated class notes is common. These resources often lack the depth, critical perspective, and updated information required to excel.
* Overloading New Topics: Attempting to cover excessive new material close to the exam instead of focusing on revision can disrupt retention and cause mental exhaustion.
* Poor Subject Selection: Candidates sometimes choose optional subjects based on trends or perceived scoring potential, rather than their prior knowledge or interest, leading to poor performance.
3. Systemic and Educational Challenges:
* Outdated Examination System: Critics argue that the CSS exam system is outdated and doesn’t adequately assess modern skills needed for civil service, with a lack of dedicated cadres for crucial modern sectors like technology or finance.
* Focus on Theoretical Evaluation: The exam heavily emphasizes theoretical knowledge through long essays and extensive syllabi, which may not fully reflect a candidate’s aptitude for practical administration.
* Quality of Coaching Academies: While many candidates rely on coaching academies, some officials criticize these institutions for promoting rote learning and memorization of likely questions rather than encouraging critical thinking and originality.
* Lack of Quality Teachers: The broader education system in Pakistan may not effectively prepare students with the necessary English language and analytical skills required for the CSS exam.
* Societal Pressure and Expectations: The immense societal and familial pressure associated with the CSS exam can lead to increased anxiety, stress, and self-doubt among candidates, hindering their performance.
* Low Passing Rate: The consistently low passing rate (often around 2-3%) itself creates a sense of discouragement and intensifies the pressure on aspirants.
4. Other Factors:
* Time Management Issues: Many candidates struggle with managing their time effectively during preparation and in the actual exam.
* Lack of Originality: Over-reliance on pre-packaged answers or ideas from guidebooks can stifle originality and creative thought, which examiners often look for.
* Test Anxiety: The fear of underperformance can lead to anxiety and loss of focus, impacting a candidate’s ability to perform effectively.
In essence, a combination of individual preparation deficiencies, systemic educational shortcomings, and the demanding nature of the exam itself contributes to the high failure rate in Pakistan’s civil service examination.
English 
العربية
An increase in Pakistan's defense budget is often considered inevitable due to a complex interplay of internal and external factors: 1. Perceived Threat from India: * Historical Context: Pakistan and India have a long history of adversarial relations, including multiple wars and frequent border clasRead more
An increase in Pakistan’s defense budget is often considered inevitable due to a complex interplay of internal and external factors:
See less1. Perceived Threat from India:
* Historical Context: Pakistan and India have a long history of adversarial relations, including multiple wars and frequent border clashes. This historical animosity fosters a deep-seated “security threat” perception in Pakistan’s defense planning.
* Arms Race: The ongoing arms race with India necessitates Pakistan to continually modernize and upgrade its military capabilities to maintain a deterrent posture.
* Recent Tensions: Recent escalations in tensions, such as border incidents and alleged terror attacks, often lead to calls for increased defense spending to enhance preparedness and national security.
2. Internal Security Challenges:
* Terrorism and Insurgency: Pakistan faces significant internal threats from various militant and terrorist groups, particularly in regions like Balochistan and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. Combating these threats requires substantial resources for counter-terrorism operations, intelligence gathering, and maintaining law and order.
* Sectarian Violence: Societal violence and sectarianism also contribute to the need for a strong internal security apparatus.
3. Geopolitical Environment and Strategic Alliances:
* Regional Instability: Pakistan’s location in a volatile region, bordering Afghanistan and Iran, adds to its security concerns. Regional instability and the presence of various non-state actors necessitate a robust defense.
* Strategic Alliances: While foreign military aid has historically helped Pakistan’s defense capabilities, it also influences its spending decisions and procurement needs.
4. Maintaining Deterrence:
* Nuclear Program: Pakistan’s nuclear program is a key component of its deterrence strategy against India. Maintaining and modernizing this program requires consistent financial investment.
* Conventional Forces: Beyond nuclear deterrence, Pakistan aims to maintain a credible conventional force to respond to various threats and ensure territorial integrity.
5. Domestic Political Dynamics:
* Influence of the Military: The military has historically played a significant role in Pakistan’s political landscape, and its influence often ensures that defense allocations remain a priority in national budgets.
* National Security Imperative: Political parties often find broad support for increasing defense spending, especially during times of heightened security threats, as it is framed as a matter of national survival and sovereignty.
6. Indigenous Defense Industry and Modernization:
* Self-Reliance: There is an ongoing effort to develop an indigenous defense industry to reduce reliance on foreign imports and enhance self-sufficiency in military hardware. This requires investment in research, development, and manufacturing capabilities.
* Technological Advancement: Keeping pace with technological advancements in warfare necessitates continuous investment in new weapons systems, surveillance, and defense technologies.
While Pakistan’s economy often struggles with debt and fiscal deficits, the perception of an existential threat and the need for national security often override economic constraints, making an increase in the defense budget an almost unavoidable aspect of its national policy.