Here’s the verified situation: according to multiple Indian outlet reports, Pakistan’s hockey federation has formally informed the FIH and Asian Hockey Federation (AHF) that it is unable to send its senior team to the upcoming Men’s Hockey Asia Cup in India, citing security concerns and players’ relRead more
Here’s the verified situation: according to multiple Indian outlet reports, Pakistan’s hockey federation has formally informed the FIH and Asian Hockey Federation (AHF) that it is unable to send its senior team to the upcoming Men’s Hockey Asia Cup in India, citing security concerns and players’ reluctance to travel (Bhaskar English).
Officials from the Pakistan Sports Board (PSB) have also confirmed that government clearance is still pending, with no final decision yet made. The matter remains under consideration by ministries of interior, foreign affairs, and sports (India Today).
Former hockey great Akhtar Rasool—now advising the AHF—has even suggested relocating Pakistan’s matches to a neutral venue if India cannot guarantee visas and player safety (Dawn).
Importantly, no official public statement has yet come directly from the Pakistani government confirming or denying the team’s withdrawal. Reports also mention that India’s Sports Ministry has stated that Pakistan would not be barred—in principle—from participating under the Olympic Charter, which prohibits host nations from politicizing multi-nation sport events (India Today).
✅ Summary Table
| Issue | Status |
|---|---|
| PHF decision | Informed FIH/AHF they will likely not participate due to security risks |
| Government approval | Still pending; final decision is in flux across ministries |
| Neutral venue request | Suggested by former PHF president to ensure player safety |
| Indian position | States it won’t block participation in multinational events |
| Final outcome | Not yet formally confirmed by Pakistan; situation evolving |
Unless new developments emerge—especially from official Pakistani sources—the reports stem primarily from Indian media and PHF communications. At present, a final decision appears pending, with the window still open for either participation (if visas and security assurances are granted) or withdrawal.
Would you like me to monitor further updates or provide background on Asia Cup qualification implications for Pakistan?
See less
English 
العربية
India's foreign policy is complex and driven by its desire for strategic autonomy. While there are signs of India attempting to stabilize or even improve relations with China, it's not a straightforward move and is influenced by various factors, including its relationship with the US and Russia. HerRead more
India’s foreign policy is complex and driven by its desire for strategic autonomy. While there are signs of India attempting to stabilize or even improve relations with China, it’s not a straightforward move and is influenced by various factors, including its relationship with the US and Russia.
See lessHere’s a breakdown of the factors at play:
1. “Disappointment with Trump” and its impact on China relations:
* Trade Tensions with the US: The current US administration under Donald Trump has employed trade leverage against India, imposing tariffs and pushing for specific trade deals. This has created some friction and a sense of unpredictability in the US-India relationship.
* Shifting US Focus: Some analyses suggest that Trump’s approach might be leading India to reassess its full alignment with the US, particularly if the US is perceived as an unreliable partner or if its policies are detrimental to India’s economic interests. This could indirectly push India to explore better ties with other major powers, including China.
* Hedging Bets: India, like many countries, seeks to diversify its partnerships to avoid over-reliance on any single nation. A challenging relationship with the US under Trump could lead India to strategically “hedge its bets” by seeking rapprochement with China.
2. India’s Approach to China:
* Border Disputes Remain Central: Despite efforts to de-escalate, the long-standing and often tense border disputes, particularly along the Line of Actual Control (LAC), remain a significant obstacle to full normalization of ties. India consistently emphasizes the need for de-escalation on the border as a prerequisite for progress in bilateral relations.
* Economic Interdependence: China has been India’s largest trading partner for many years, leading to significant economic interdependence. India faces a large trade deficit with China. While there have been efforts to reduce reliance on Chinese imports, economic realities often necessitate continued engagement.
* Strategic Rivalry: India views China’s growing influence in South Asia and the Indian Ocean Region, including its strong ties with Pakistan, as a major security concern. China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) is also a point of contention for India.
* Recent Thaw, but with Caution: There have been recent diplomatic engagements, including India’s External Affairs Minister’s visit to China. This signals a cautious attempt to improve relations and find areas of cooperation, especially on global issues. However, India is clear that contentious bilateral issues, like the border dispute, must be addressed.
3. Trade Arms and Russia’s Role:
* Long-standing Russia-India Ties: India has a deep and historic defense relationship with Russia, relying on it for a significant portion of its military equipment. Russia has been a reliable supplier of arms and has been willing to share technology and co-produce weapons with India, unlike some Western nations.
* Strategic Autonomy: India’s continued strong ties with Russia, despite US objections, are a testament to its commitment to strategic autonomy. India views Russia as a crucial source of arms and energy, and a key member of international groupings like BRICS and SCO where both India and China are members.
* Russia as a Bridge? Russia has an interest in maintaining good relations with both India and China. While Russia’s increasing dependence on China due to Western sanctions might complicate this, there’s a possibility that Russia could, in some contexts, facilitate dialogue or cooperation between India and China, for example, within forums like the RIC (Russia-India-China) troika.
In conclusion:
India is not necessarily “trying to improve relations with China” in a way that suggests a full alignment or a shift away from its other partnerships. Instead, it’s pursuing a strategy of “multi-alignment” or “strategic autonomy” in a complex geopolitical landscape.
* The “disappointment with Trump” administration’s unpredictable policies and trade pressures might be prompting India to explore ways to reduce its vulnerability by diversifying its relationships.
* While a full resolution of the border dispute with China remains elusive and a major impediment, India is seeking to stabilize the relationship and find common ground on global issues.
* India’s enduring defense ties with Russia are a critical component of its strategic autonomy and indirectly influence its balancing act between the US and China.
Ultimately, India’s foreign policy is about protecting its national interests, securing its borders, and enhancing its global standing in a multipolar world. This often involves a delicate balancing act and pragmatic engagement with all major powers.