YouTube has introduced a new feature for Shorts called the “Add Yours” sticker, inspired by Instagram and TikTok. This feature allows creators to prompt viewers to share their own videos in response, fostering community engagement and trend creation. Once a creator adds the sticker with a prompt, viewers can tap it to submit their own Shorts, creating a chain of related content. This functionality is similar to TikTok’s “Duet” feature and Instagram’s “Add Yours” sticker. (Swipe Insight, TechCrunch, Social Media Today)

The “Add Yours” sticker is now available to all users after a successful test phase. Creators can access it by recording a Short, tapping the sticker icon, selecting “Add Yours,” and entering a prompt. The sticker appears on the published Short, and viewers can interact with it to create their own responses. (TechCrunch, Search Engine Journal)

This feature aims to enhance user interaction and encourage viral trends within the YouTube Shorts community.(Search Engine Journal)

The MRI technique used in the 1940s to help determine death isn’t well-documented because MRI technology itself was not developed until much later. MRI (Magnetic Resonance Imaging) as a medical imaging tool was first introduced in the 1970s and became widely used in the 1980s.

If you’re asking about how death was determined in the 1940s, MRI was not involved. Back then, death was determined primarily through clinical examination — checking for the absence of heartbeat, respiration, pupil response, and reflexes. The concept of brain death as a formal diagnosis developed later, and MRI became a tool to assist with brain imaging well after that.

If you meant something else or are referring to a different kind of imaging or test from the 1940s, could you clarify? Or maybe you’re asking about an MRI technique developed later that was used to determine brain death retrospectively? Let me know!

The most groundbreaking new WhatsApp feature that truly has the potential to change messaging forever is its forthcoming “Guest Chats” (aka “chats with guests”) capability. This function will allow WhatsApp users to send messages to people who don’t have WhatsApp installed or a registered account—a major paradigm shift for the platform (Cinco Días).

🚀 Why Guest Chats Are So Disruptive:

• No app required: Non-users can open a secure chat in their browser via an invitation link—no WhatsApp account or download needed.
• Encrypted by design: These chats will still use end‑to‑end encryption, preserving privacy even for non‑registered users (Cinco Días, The Times of India).
• Lower entry barriers: Enables one-time or casual connections—ideal for business inquiries, event planning, or guest communication without requiring full signup.
• Mass adoption potential: Could drastically expand WhatsApp’s reach and convert non‑users into new users over time.

🧭 What You Should Know:

• The feature is still in beta testing (e.g. Android version 2.25.22.13).
• There’s no official launch date yet, but it’s expected within the upcoming months (Cinco Días).
• Early reports come both from India Today (Times of India) and El País, signaling global rollout intent (The Times of India, Cinco Días).

🌐 Context from Competing Developments

WhatsApp is also rolling out several other noteworthy updates currently reshaping its landscape:

• Message Summaries (AI): Provides AI-powered summaries of unread messages—streamlining catch-up in busy chats (currently in U.S. beta) (Sammy Fans).
• Meta AI assistant integration: Embedded into the search bar and chat interface, though currently under EU antitrust scrutiny for aggressive integration (reuters.com).
• Enhanced privacy and safety tools: Including “safety overview” before joining unknown groups, advanced invitation controls, and chat privacy settings to reduce scams (theverge.com).

📊 Summary Comparison

In conclusion, while AI enhancements and privacy upgrades are reshaping how people use WhatsApp, the ability to chat securely with anyone—even non‑users—is the feature poised to fundamentally alter the platform’s boundaries. It bridges WhatsApp’s walled garden and opens the door to a far more inclusive messaging experience.

Let me know if you’d like to explore any of these features more deeply or check availability on your device!

It looks like you’re referring to a worrisome outbreak involving thousands of babies reportedly born with a dangerous virus. Based on current reporting, here are the most relevant findings:

🧠 Zika Virus & Brain-Damaged Newborns (2015–2016)

• During the 2015–16 Zika epidemic in Brazil, official figures showed around 1.5 million Zika infections and ~3,500 confirmed cases of microcephaly in newborns in a span of just a few months (BBC, Wikipedia).
• WHO experts warned that “many thousands” of infants infected could suffer neurological abnormalities beyond microcephaly—such as seizures, spasticity, feeding issues, and vision impairments (Jerusalem Post).

Summary:

While the figure “thousands” aligns with that Zika crisis, those events occurred nearly a decade ago.

📌 Other Viruses That Affect Infants

• Congenital Cytomegalovirus (CMV)

• 1 in 100–500 babies are born infected globally.
• About 10–15% show symptoms at birth, and long-term effects happen in up to 80–90% of those symptomatic cases—such as hearing loss, vision impairment or cognitive delays (Wikipedia).
• Not typically described as “thousands born infected” in headlines, but still a leading cause of non‑genetic hearing loss.

• Syphilis (Congenital Syphilis)

• In the US alone, over 3,700 babies were born with congenital syphilis in 2022—a tenfold increase since 2012, with nearly 300 infant deaths (Wikipedia, CNN).

• Measles or Rubella

• In Ontario, Canada, six babies were born with measles to unvaccinated mothers during a 2025 outbreak; one premature congenital infection was fatal (The Guardian).
• Rubella infection early in pregnancy carries a 90% chance of congenital rubella syndrome, which can lead to serious birth defects or death (CNN).

⚠️ Current Outbreak Reporting?

I found no recent or current reports (2024–2025) indicating thousands of babies born with a dangerous virus like in the Zika epidemic. The closest matches are older events or increases in congenital infections due to syphilis or CMV—none reporting thousands in a single country or outbreak at once recently.

🔍 Key Takeaways

• The phrase “thousands of babies born with virus” most closely resembles the 2015–16 Zika microcephaly crisis in Latin America.
• More recent congenital infection spikes (like syphilis in the US, CMV globally) involve significant numbers, but not mass outbreaks in the thousands at once.
• If you have seen this headline in a recent context, it may be referencing Zika or using alarming language about congenital syphilis or CMV—but it doesn’t match any verified 2024–2025 epidemic.

Would you mind sharing where you saw that headline, or which virus and region it refers to? I can help verify or clarify the data further.

You’re absolutely right—many everyday items and exposures have been linked to an increased risk of cancer, especially with long-term or high-level exposure. However, it’s important to understand that the level of risk often depends on the dose, frequency, and duration of exposure, as well as individual factors like genetics and overall health.

Here are some common everyday items or exposures that have been associated with cancer risk:

🔥 Household & Personal Care Products

1. Tobacco smoke (including secondhand smoke) – Strongly linked to lung, throat, and many other cancers.
2. Talcum powder (especially with asbestos contamination) – Possible link to ovarian cancer.
3. Hair dyes (especially dark, permanent ones used before the 1980s) – Mixed evidence, but may pose a risk with frequent use.
4. Certain dry-cleaning chemicals (like perchloroethylene) – Linked to increased cancer risk in occupational settings.

☢️ Environmental & Occupational Exposures

1. Air pollution (especially diesel exhaust and fine particulate matter) – Linked to lung cancer and possibly others.
2. Radon gas (a naturally occurring radioactive gas) – Second leading cause of lung cancer.
3. Asbestos (in older buildings, insulation) – Causes mesothelioma and other cancers.
4. Pesticides & herbicides – Some (like glyphosate) are classified as “probably carcinogenic” by the WHO.

🍟 Food & Packaging

1. Processed meats (e.g., bacon, hot dogs, sausages) – Classified as a Group 1 carcinogen by the WHO (linked to colorectal cancer).
2. Red meat (especially grilled or charred) – Considered “probably carcinogenic.”
3. Microwave popcorn bags (with older nonstick coatings like PFOA) – Linked to various cancers.
4. Plastic containers (especially when heated) – Some contain BPA or phthalates, which are endocrine disruptors and may increase cancer risk.

☀️ Lifestyle Factors

1. Alcohol – Linked to several types of cancer, including breast, liver, and esophageal.
2. UV radiation (from sun or tanning beds) – Strong link to skin cancers including melanoma.
3. Obesity – A risk factor for at least 13 types of cancer.
4. Lack of physical activity – Can increase cancer risk indirectly through obesity and inflammation.

🧪 Cosmetics & Skincare

1. Some sunscreens (with oxybenzone) – Controversial; potential hormone disruptor.
2. Formaldehyde (in some nail products, hair straighteners) – Known human carcinogen.
3. Parabens & phthalates – Endocrine disruptors, but the link to cancer is still being studied.

Important Notes:

• Not all exposures guarantee cancer—risk is probabilistic, not absolute.
• Regulation varies by country—some ingredients banned in the EU are still allowed in the US or elsewhere.
• Dose matters: Occasional use is generally less risky than chronic or high exposure.

Would you like a printable list, or a more detailed breakdown of how to reduce your exposure to these items?